Y'all are taking my post way too seriously.

Mark me down as a B+.

NFometer: (95%)[↑ 2%]
Based on the Ratings of 30 Members
Average Score: (8.7/10)




Positive

m4st4 (10/10)
antovolk (10/10)
SINCEPTION (10/10)
xWhereAmI? (10/10)
Dunkirk2017! (10/10)
Ruth (9.5/10)
Allstar (9.5/10)
CoolwhipSpecial (9.5/10)*
AsianVersionOfET (9.5/10)
Vader182 (9.25/10)
Sanchez (9/10)*
4N Legend (9/10)
prowlercomesaround (9/10)*
BlairCo (9/10)
Ivan (9/10)*
Crazy Eight (9/10)
spade (9/10)
Skyab23 (8.6/10)*
Silverheart (8.5/10)
elemunt (8/10)
Cilogy (8/10)
Michaelf2225 (8/10)
LeoCobb (8/10)
mosh89 (8/10)*
Mantis Toboggan (8/10)
LelekPL (8/10)
07212017 (7.9/10)*
Sky007 (7/10)*




Mixed to Positive

ArmandFancypants (6.5/10)




Mixed

MyCocaine (5/10)





£

Seen it twice, loved it.
8.7

Reports are it made $31.5 million at the box office.

Even with 50 M there wasn't much hope for this film to make any money while in theaters , but 31 M is beyond terrible.£

Even with a disappointing $31 million opening, it still should make around $100 million at the domestic box office and internationally, it should make quite a bit (it made over $81 million internationally in a few markets this past weekend) also. I still see this film turning a profit, just not a gigantic one as many predicted. And I'm not that surprised; like the original, it's an art house film set in the sci-fi genre. It's not for everyone.

Master Virgo wrote:Even with 50 M there wasn't much hope for this film to make any money while in theaters , but 31 M is beyond terrible.£

Gosling isn’t much of a draw and has had a lot of flops. Someone more bankable in the lead would have helped but he was so perfectly cast here.

What? Everybody loves him, even hardcore feminists and straight guys. I doubt he's the problem here