Silver Linings Playbook (2012)

All non-Nolan related film, tv, and streaming discussions.
User avatar
Posts: 3757
Joined: January 2013
Location: Missouri
TheExtractorCobb wrote:
banepants wrote:
Way to miss David O. Russell's message
And that is? I'm sorry. I like David O. Russell as much as the next guy, but this was a scenario where he took a young adult novel and tried making something mainstream, but sadly dishonest. He's trying to make something more commercial. It's a movie for Middle America. I could take my family to see this since Pat and Tiffany rarely do anything too alienating or polarizing. I'm okay with a happy ending, but how we get there...not so much. It's harmless, inoffensive, cliched, contrived, predictable, comfortable fluff. It's comfort food. It's not interested in delving into things painful, honest, challenging, or real especially in that 2nd half. Forget questions of authenticity regarding mental illness, this movie isn't at all how people act or at least should act. It's like movieland world. These aren't real people. Their movie characters. Antagonizing brothers to characters who just got out of a hospital, the only philly cop in town who hits on a fellow cop's widowed wife, and a token black character who just is there to push the story along and say "black it up Pat". It's really hackneyed writing on Russell's part. Shockingly so actually. The film tries validating the character's lies. The female characters are poorly written. One is barely heard, usually making something in the kitchen and the other has an incredible low self-esteem that she has to try to lie and manipulate to get Pat in the 2nd half who is the typical movie male protagonist oblivious to this girl until the 3rd act. Most of the time he's just mean to her claiming she is crazier than he is. Really man? She just said she's gonna do you a favor and you're gonna insult her. That can't be due to your bipolar disorder.

As for Tiffany, I don't care if she thinks she knows what's best for him. This is his marriage. It's not a joke. She can't impose what she thinks is best. I can appreciate she wants to get what she wants now in her life, but she has to be respectful of what he wants. She shouldn't lie to do it. If she was lying purely as only a friend, I might be able to tolerate it. It would be different maybe if she didn't have an ulterior motive. It's what he wants that is important. Only in a movieland would he take her lie as sweet and nice. When she says she is okay with her sexuality, it's refreshing, but the film bails on that and she seems like she uses sex in times of loneliness to gain attention or as the psychiatrist would say a friend. She wouldn't be a whore if she just liked sex, but she is one, because he wants things in return. God forbid we have a female character who just likes sex. I guess cause we would have to scorn her for it so let's add another psychological motivation. Instead she does it because she's depressed. Tiffany might be the most misogynistic character I've seen in sometime and yet I felt bad for her. She is gonna love him so much and he's too self centered and rude that she won't get it back. You want her to gain some confidence. Throughout the film she's metaphorically saying "Hey! I'm here! Hello?" Usually depressed individuals like herself are also not happy with themselves so I found it odd when she said she likes herself. Why she's after a substitute teacher who lives with his parents, is bipolar, got released recently from a mental hospital, and is trying to patch things up with his wife, I will never know. He treats her terribly. Yea he defends her in front of that guy, but only to get what he wants. It seems like a lot of drama for a young girl who already has her issues. As I said before, she seems to be invisible to him. Yea, he looks her in certain ways because she flaunts her stuff to get his attention. He is human. He is gonna look.

While he's self centered, he's oddly also a walking doormat for Nikki, Tiffany, and his family. He's lied to, manipulated, and used. He also doesn't need the drama of a girl who just recently lost her husband and is in a state of depression. When do these two start to like one another? Through the lame dance montage? This relationship wouldn't last long. It certainly wouldn't be healthy and that has nothing to do with their mental illness. Her depression was before even Tommy died, so getting Pat doesn't help at all. I know he's okay with her lying about the letter, but who is to say she won't lie about other things. Also I know many are saying "Of course. Who better to be with Pat then someone else mentally struggling?", but I really don't think that's the case. One of them has to be the rock and I guess that might be Tiffany, but her low self-esteem doesn't help. She won't be able to carry it on her own. Watch Blue Valentine. That is a relationship falling apart, but those are real people.

We have to buy that Pat is better simply because he says so. We have maybe the most cartoonish dad in a movie history. This guy wasn't sharp. He believes in superstitions. He sends his bipolar son to a game when he should have known there was a chance he would get into a fight. If Pat Sr. got into a fight there's a chance his son would. He only supports his son when it's to his mutual benefit. The characters in this film are incredibly selfish. Who knows what would happen if Pat and Tiffany didn't score high enough.

Pat: Hey dad sorry about the...
Pat Sr: Get the f*ck out of my face. Loser.

We have two beautiful movie stars to get the asses in the seats for the people who don't see movies when they don't recognize the actors. Also it helps their attractive so whatever they do, it will be easier for audience members to swallow. "Oh he's bipolar. Good thing he looks like Bradley Cooper and most of his episodes are easily provoked and that someone without bipolar disorder might do the same thing." Or with Tiffany "Ah man she's depressed. I wouldn't want to deal with...oh wait it just makes her sleep with guys and she looks like Jennifer Lawrence." We got Jacki Weaver for the women 55 and older. She is actually playing the most sympathetic character although her nomination is baffling as she had nothing to do. We got Robert De Niro for the older audience. He's my favorite actor, but saying this is his better work than he's done lately is the most faint praise I've heard. He's solid. That's about it. Cooper for the Hangover crowd and Jennifer Lawrence who now not only a talented actress, but a bona fide movie star. Hell the movie sells itself for Harvey Weinstein.

The comeback of De Niro
Bradley Cooper branches out
Hunger Games teen sensation Jennifer Lawrence solidifies herself as an movie star and a actress(yea I know she already had Winter's Bone)
The feel good movie of the year
The little film that could(not that little though with the likes of Bradley Cooper, Jennifer Lawrence, and Robert De Niro. Weaver's casting is the only thing not distracting. Only one I kind of bought as someone from Philly)

Lastly I said it was unoffensive, but the more I think about it....it is kind of offensive. This whole cutesy "We're all a little crazy sometimes" is an annoying way of trivializing bipolar disorder.
Way to miss banepants' message. :roll:

User avatar
Posts: 11389
Joined: December 2011
TheExtractorCobb wrote: And that is? I'm sorry. I like David O. Russell as much as the next guy, but this was a scenario where he took a young adult novel and tried making something mainstream, but sadly dishonest. He's trying to make something more commercial. It's a movie for Middle America. I could take my family to see this since Pat and Tiffany rarely do anything too alienating or polarizing. I'm okay with a happy ending, but how we get there...not so much. It's harmless, inoffensive, cliched, contrived, predictable, comfortable fluff. It's comfort food. It's not interested in delving into things painful, honest, challenging, or real especially in that 2nd half. Forget questions of authenticity regarding mental illness, this movie isn't at all how people act or at least should act. It's like movieland world. These aren't real people. Their movie characters. Antagonizing brothers to characters who just got out of a hospital, the only philly cop in town who hits on a fellow cop's widowed wife, and a token black character who just is there to push the story along and say "black it up Pat". It's really hackneyed writing on Russell's part. Shockingly so actually. The film tries validating the character's lies. The female characters are poorly written. One is barely heard, usually making something in the kitchen and the other has an incredible low self-esteem that she has to try to lie and manipulate to get Pat in the 2nd half who is the typical movie male protagonist oblivious to this girl until the 3rd act. Most of the time he's just mean to her claiming she is crazier than he is. Really man? She just said she's gonna do you a favor and you're gonna insult her. That can't be due to your bipolar disorder.

As for Tiffany, I don't care if she thinks she knows what's best for him. This is his marriage. It's not a joke. She can't impose what she thinks is best. I can appreciate she wants to get what she wants now in her life, but she has to be respectful of what he wants. She shouldn't lie to do it. If she was lying purely as only a friend, I might be able to tolerate it. It would be different maybe if she didn't have an ulterior motive. It's what he wants that is important. Only in a movieland would he take her lie as sweet and nice. When she says she is okay with her sexuality, it's refreshing, but the film bails on that and she seems like she uses sex in times of loneliness to gain attention or as the psychiatrist would say a friend. She wouldn't be a whore if she just liked sex, but she is one, because he wants things in return. God forbid we have a female character who just likes sex. I guess cause we would have to scorn her for it so let's add another psychological motivation. Instead she does it because she's depressed. Tiffany might be the most misogynistic character I've seen in sometime and yet I felt bad for her. She is gonna love him so much and he's too self centered and rude that she won't get it back. You want her to gain some confidence. Throughout the film she's metaphorically saying "Hey! I'm here! Hello?" Usually depressed individuals like herself are also not happy with themselves so I found it odd when she said she likes herself. Why she's after a substitute teacher who lives with his parents, is bipolar, got released recently from a mental hospital, and is trying to patch things up with his wife, I will never know. He treats her terribly. Yea he defends her in front of that guy, but only to get what he wants. It seems like a lot of drama for a young girl who already has her issues. As I said before, she seems to be invisible to him. Yea, he looks her in certain ways because she flaunts her stuff to get his attention. He is human. He is gonna look.

While he's self centered, he's oddly also a walking doormat for Nikki, Tiffany, and his family. He's lied to, manipulated, and used. He also doesn't need the drama of a girl who just recently lost her husband and is in a state of depression. When do these two start to like one another? Through the lame dance montage? This relationship wouldn't last long. It certainly wouldn't be healthy and that has nothing to do with their mental illness. Her depression was before even Tommy died, so getting Pat doesn't help at all. I know he's okay with her lying about the letter, but who is to say she won't lie about other things. Also I know many are saying "Of course. Who better to be with Pat then someone else mentally struggling?", but I really don't think that's the case. One of them has to be the rock and I guess that might be Tiffany, but her low self-esteem doesn't help. She won't be able to carry it on her own. Watch Blue Valentine. That is a relationship falling apart, but those are real people.

We have to buy that Pat is better simply because he says so. We have maybe the most cartoonish dad in a movie history. This guy wasn't sharp. He believes in superstitions. He sends his bipolar son to a game when he should have known there was a chance he would get into a fight. If Pat Sr. got into a fight there's a chance his son would. He only supports his son when it's to his mutual benefit. The characters in this film are incredibly selfish. Who knows what would happen if Pat and Tiffany didn't score high enough.

Pat: Hey dad sorry about the...
Pat Sr: Get the f*ck out of my face. Loser.

We have two beautiful movie stars to get the asses in the seats for the people who don't see movies when they don't recognize the actors. Also it helps their attractive so whatever they do, it will be easier for audience members to swallow. "Oh he's bipolar. Good thing he looks like Bradley Cooper and most of his episodes are easily provoked and that someone without bipolar disorder might do the same thing." Or with Tiffany "Ah man she's depressed. I wouldn't want to deal with...oh wait it just makes her sleep with guys and she looks like Jennifer Lawrence." We got Jacki Weaver for the women 55 and older. She is actually playing the most sympathetic character although her nomination is baffling as she had nothing to do. We got Robert De Niro for the older audience. He's my favorite actor, but saying this is his better work than he's done lately is the most faint praise I've heard. He's solid. That's about it. Cooper for the Hangover crowd and Jennifer Lawrence who now not only a talented actress, but a bona fide movie star. Hell the movie sells itself for Harvey Weinstein.

The comeback of De Niro
Bradley Cooper branches out
Hunger Games teen sensation Jennifer Lawrence solidifies herself as an movie star and a actress(yea I know she already had Winter's Bone)
The feel good movie of the year
The little film that could(not that little though with the likes of Bradley Cooper, Jennifer Lawrence, and Robert De Niro. Weaver's casting is the only thing not distracting. Only one I kind of bought as someone from Philly)

Lastly I said it was unoffensive, but the more I think about it....it is kind of offensive. This whole cutesy "We're all a little crazy sometimes" is an annoying way of trivializing bipolar disorder.
Image

User avatar
Posts: 6087
Joined: June 2012
Location: Colorado
To be honest, theextractorcobb, I was just fucking with you originally, but I respect the fact that you've taken the time to type all of that. You have obviously thought through your opinion very well. However, I must say that while I agree that the film doesn't accurately display the complete ugliness of bipolar disorder, I ask you this: Is that REALLY so bad? Is it bad that I can leave the theater feeling good? It's a movie, my friend. We already have Blue Valentine. We already have real life, and most of us here have either struggled with depression/bipolar disorder or have loved someone who has.

In that spirit, is it really so bad to love a movie that makes me feel absolutely great?

In the words of our patron saint:

"Sometimes the truth isn't good enough, sometimes people deserve more. Sometimes people deserve to have their faith rewarded..."

Posts: 1258
Joined: June 2012
TheExtractorCobb wrote:
banepants wrote:
Way to miss David O. Russell's message
And that is? I'm sorry. I like David O. Russell as much as the next guy, but this was a scenario where he took a young adult novel and tried making something mainstream, but sadly dishonest. He's trying to make something more commercial. It's a movie for Middle America. I could take my family to see this since Pat and Tiffany rarely do anything too alienating or polarizing. I'm okay with a happy ending, but how we get there...not so much. It's harmless, inoffensive, cliched, contrived, predictable, comfortable fluff. It's comfort food. It's not interested in delving into things painful, honest, challenging, or real especially in that 2nd half. Forget questions of authenticity regarding mental illness, this movie isn't at all how people act or at least should act. It's like movieland world. These aren't real people. Their movie characters. Antagonizing brothers to characters who just got out of a hospital, the only philly cop in town who hits on a fellow cop's widowed wife, and a token black character who just is there to push the story along and say "black it up Pat". It's really hackneyed writing on Russell's part. Shockingly so actually. The film tries validating the character's lies. The female characters are poorly written. One is barely heard, usually making something in the kitchen and the other has an incredible low self-esteem that she has to try to lie and manipulate to get Pat in the 2nd half who is the typical movie male protagonist oblivious to this girl until the 3rd act. Most of the time he's just mean to her claiming she is crazier than he is. Really man? She just said she's gonna do you a favor and you're gonna insult her. That can't be due to your bipolar disorder.

As for Tiffany, I don't care if she thinks she knows what's best for him. This is his marriage. It's not a joke. She can't impose what she thinks is best. I can appreciate she wants to get what she wants now in her life, but she has to be respectful of what he wants. She shouldn't lie to do it. If she was lying purely as only a friend, I might be able to tolerate it. It would be different maybe if she didn't have an ulterior motive. It's what he wants that is important. Only in a movieland would he take her lie as sweet and nice. When she says she is okay with her sexuality, it's refreshing, but the film bails on that and she seems like she uses sex in times of loneliness to gain attention or as the psychiatrist would say a friend. She wouldn't be a whore if she just liked sex, but she is one, because he wants things in return. God forbid we have a female character who just likes sex. I guess cause we would have to scorn her for it so let's add another psychological motivation. Instead she does it because she's depressed. Tiffany might be the most misogynistic character I've seen in sometime and yet I felt bad for her. She is gonna love him so much and he's too self centered and rude that she won't get it back. You want her to gain some confidence. Throughout the film she's metaphorically saying "Hey! I'm here! Hello?" Usually depressed individuals like herself are also not happy with themselves so I found it odd when she said she likes herself. Why she's after a substitute teacher who lives with his parents, is bipolar, got released recently from a mental hospital, and is trying to patch things up with his wife, I will never know. He treats her terribly. Yea he defends her in front of that guy, but only to get what he wants. It seems like a lot of drama for a young girl who already has her issues. As I said before, she seems to be invisible to him. Yea, he looks her in certain ways because she flaunts her stuff to get his attention. He is human. He is gonna look.

While he's self centered, he's oddly also a walking doormat for Nikki, Tiffany, and his family. He's lied to, manipulated, and used. He also doesn't need the drama of a girl who just recently lost her husband and is in a state of depression. When do these two start to like one another? Through the lame dance montage? This relationship wouldn't last long. It certainly wouldn't be healthy and that has nothing to do with their mental illness. Her depression was before even Tommy died, so getting Pat doesn't help at all. I know he's okay with her lying about the letter, but who is to say she won't lie about other things. Also I know many are saying "Of course. Who better to be with Pat then someone else mentally struggling?", but I really don't think that's the case. One of them has to be the rock and I guess that might be Tiffany, but her low self-esteem doesn't help. She won't be able to carry it on her own. Watch Blue Valentine. That is a relationship falling apart, but those are real people.

We have to buy that Pat is better simply because he says so. We have maybe the most cartoonish dad in a movie history. This guy wasn't sharp. He believes in superstitions. He sends his bipolar son to a game when he should have known there was a chance he would get into a fight. If Pat Sr. got into a fight there's a chance his son would. He only supports his son when it's to his mutual benefit. The characters in this film are incredibly selfish. Who knows what would happen if Pat and Tiffany didn't score high enough.

Pat: Hey dad sorry about the...
Pat Sr: Get the f*ck out of my face. Loser.

We have two beautiful movie stars to get the asses in the seats for the people who don't see movies when they don't recognize the actors. Also it helps their attractive so whatever they do, it will be easier for audience members to swallow. "Oh he's bipolar. Good thing he looks like Bradley Cooper and most of his episodes are easily provoked and that someone without bipolar disorder might do the same thing." Or with Tiffany "Ah man she's depressed. I wouldn't want to deal with...oh wait it just makes her sleep with guys and she looks like Jennifer Lawrence." We got Jacki Weaver for the women 55 and older. She is actually playing the most sympathetic character although her nomination is baffling as she had nothing to do. We got Robert De Niro for the older audience. He's my favorite actor, but saying this is his better work than he's done lately is the most faint praise I've heard. He's solid. That's about it. Cooper for the Hangover crowd and Jennifer Lawrence who now not only a talented actress, but a bona fide movie star. Hell the movie sells itself for Harvey Weinstein.

The comeback of De Niro
Bradley Cooper branches out
Hunger Games teen sensation Jennifer Lawrence solidifies herself as an movie star and a actress(yea I know she already had Winter's Bone)
The feel good movie of the year
The little film that could(not that little though with the likes of Bradley Cooper, Jennifer Lawrence, and Robert De Niro. Weaver's casting is the only thing not distracting. Only one I kind of bought as someone from Philly)

Lastly I said it was unoffensive, but the more I think about it....it is kind of offensive. This whole cutesy "We're all a little crazy sometimes" is an annoying way of trivializing bipolar disorder.
:eh:

Posts: 335
Joined: June 2010
banepants wrote:To be honest, theextractorcobb, I was just fucking with you originally, but I respect the fact that you've taken the time to type all of that. You have obviously thought through your opinion very well. However, I must say that while I agree that the film doesn't accurately display the complete ugliness of bipolar disorder, I ask you this: Is that REALLY so bad? Is it bad that I can leave the theater feeling good? It's a movie, my friend. We already have Blue Valentine. We already have real life, and most of us here have either struggled with depression/bipolar disorder or have loved someone who has.

In that spirit, is it really so bad to love a movie that makes me feel absolutely great?

In the words of our patron saint:

"Sometimes the truth isn't good enough, sometimes people deserve more. Sometimes people deserve to have their faith rewarded..."
Fair enough. I'm okay with a happy ending, but I wish we didn't have to go through such Hollywood circumstances. I also kind of wish he took a pill when he was sitting on that chair with Tiffany in that final shot. On one hand I'm fine with not really digging the flick and on the other I'm just sort of baffled by the praise. For me there are too many films that obscure the truth. The movie seems to believe in what the characters preach. The world is too negative so why read the works of Ernest Hemingway or even Lord of the Flies. Okay fine, but eh...we got enough movies that detract from reality. I want a better balance from Hollywood. If people leave with a good feeling at the end that's perfectly fine, but to me it sort of falls apart in retrospect. I guess it's best not to over think it.

That's why a film with some interesting similarities like Perks of Being a Wallflower worked so much more for me. It's more character driven than plot driven despite a 3rd act twist that I'm torn if it works for me or not. Let's just say the thing that happened to that protagonist does happen to people and it was the thing was plaguing him the entire time so I'll let it go.

There are still qualities I like about Silver Linings Playbook. The performances are fairly solid. While Cooper might be one note at times, I like how he's branching out. He's got enough charisma to carry as a lead. He's particularly good in the quieter moments. Lawrence does quite a bit with a character I don't care for despite her humor and her outgoing nature and even with all of his post 90s mannerisms, De Niro seems more invested than usual. He's handles the comedy really well. There's also the chaotic nature of family within this flick. No one does that better than Russell. For better or for worse your head is spinning in that scene with the entire family going over the bet. Had they actually won the competition I would have flipped off the screen, but I like how they only got enough to win the bet. That's clever or clever enough.

I want Russell to find a better balance. The Fighter was that despite a predictable, but appropriate final last match to close the flick. There was a level of authenticity for Lowell and it's locals. That was missing here. I have no doubt that Russell will make another great flick again someday. He's talented as indicated with Flirting with Disaster and Three Kings. Even if its diluted, his talent is still evident in SLP. Maybe he just needed better source material.

User avatar
Posts: 4317
Joined: June 2012
Location: SUH-waaaaannn-SEA
TheExtractorCobb wrote:
banepants wrote:
Way to miss David O. Russell's message
And that is? I'm sorry. I like David O. Russell as much as the next guy, but this was a scenario where he took a young adult novel and tried making something mainstream, but sadly dishonest. He's trying to make something more commercial. It's a movie for Middle America. I could take my family to see this since Pat and Tiffany rarely do anything too alienating or polarizing. I'm okay with a happy ending, but how we get there...not so much. It's harmless, inoffensive, cliched, contrived, predictable, comfortable fluff. It's comfort food. It's not interested in delving into things painful, honest, challenging, or real especially in that 2nd half. Forget questions of authenticity regarding mental illness, this movie isn't at all how people act or at least should act. It's like movieland world. These aren't real people. Their movie characters. Antagonizing brothers to characters who just got out of a hospital, the only philly cop in town who hits on a fellow cop's widowed wife, and a token black character who just is there to push the story along and say "black it up Pat". It's really hackneyed writing on Russell's part. Shockingly so actually. The film tries validating the character's lies. The female characters are poorly written. One is barely heard, usually making something in the kitchen and the other has an incredible low self-esteem that she has to try to lie and manipulate to get Pat in the 2nd half who is the typical movie male protagonist oblivious to this girl until the 3rd act. Most of the time he's just mean to her claiming she is crazier than he is. Really man? She just said she's gonna do you a favor and you're gonna insult her. That can't be due to your bipolar disorder.

As for Tiffany, I don't care if she thinks she knows what's best for him. This is his marriage. It's not a joke. She can't impose what she thinks is best. I can appreciate she wants to get what she wants now in her life, but she has to be respectful of what he wants. She shouldn't lie to do it. If she was lying purely as only a friend, I might be able to tolerate it. It would be different maybe if she didn't have an ulterior motive. It's what he wants that is important. Only in a movieland would he take her lie as sweet and nice. When she says she is okay with her sexuality, it's refreshing, but the film bails on that and she seems like she uses sex in times of loneliness to gain attention or as the psychiatrist would say a friend. She wouldn't be a whore if she just liked sex, but she is one, because he wants things in return. God forbid we have a female character who just likes sex. I guess cause we would have to scorn her for it so let's add another psychological motivation. Instead she does it because she's depressed. Tiffany might be the most misogynistic character I've seen in sometime and yet I felt bad for her. She is gonna love him so much and he's too self centered and rude that she won't get it back. You want her to gain some confidence. Throughout the film she's metaphorically saying "Hey! I'm here! Hello?" Usually depressed individuals like herself are also not happy with themselves so I found it odd when she said she likes herself. Why she's after a substitute teacher who lives with his parents, is bipolar, got released recently from a mental hospital, and is trying to patch things up with his wife, I will never know. He treats her terribly. Yea he defends her in front of that guy, but only to get what he wants. It seems like a lot of drama for a young girl who already has her issues. As I said before, she seems to be invisible to him. Yea, he looks her in certain ways because she flaunts her stuff to get his attention. He is human. He is gonna look.

While he's self centered, he's oddly also a walking doormat for Nikki, Tiffany, and his family. He's lied to, manipulated, and used. He also doesn't need the drama of a girl who just recently lost her husband and is in a state of depression. When do these two start to like one another? Through the lame dance montage? This relationship wouldn't last long. It certainly wouldn't be healthy and that has nothing to do with their mental illness. Her depression was before even Tommy died, so getting Pat doesn't help at all. I know he's okay with her lying about the letter, but who is to say she won't lie about other things. Also I know many are saying "Of course. Who better to be with Pat then someone else mentally struggling?", but I really don't think that's the case. One of them has to be the rock and I guess that might be Tiffany, but her low self-esteem doesn't help. She won't be able to carry it on her own. Watch Blue Valentine. That is a relationship falling apart, but those are real people.

We have to buy that Pat is better simply because he says so. We have maybe the most cartoonish dad in a movie history. This guy wasn't sharp. He believes in superstitions. He sends his bipolar son to a game when he should have known there was a chance he would get into a fight. If Pat Sr. got into a fight there's a chance his son would. He only supports his son when it's to his mutual benefit. The characters in this film are incredibly selfish. Who knows what would happen if Pat and Tiffany didn't score high enough.

Pat: Hey dad sorry about the...
Pat Sr: Get the f*ck out of my face. Loser.

We have two beautiful movie stars to get the asses in the seats for the people who don't see movies when they don't recognize the actors. Also it helps their attractive so whatever they do, it will be easier for audience members to swallow. "Oh he's bipolar. Good thing he looks like Bradley Cooper and most of his episodes are easily provoked and that someone without bipolar disorder might do the same thing." Or with Tiffany "Ah man she's depressed. I wouldn't want to deal with...oh wait it just makes her sleep with guys and she looks like Jennifer Lawrence." We got Jacki Weaver for the women 55 and older. She is actually playing the most sympathetic character although her nomination is baffling as she had nothing to do. We got Robert De Niro for the older audience. He's my favorite actor, but saying this is his better work than he's done lately is the most faint praise I've heard. He's solid. That's about it. Cooper for the Hangover crowd and Jennifer Lawrence who now not only a talented actress, but a bona fide movie star. Hell the movie sells itself for Harvey Weinstein.

The comeback of De Niro
Bradley Cooper branches out
Hunger Games teen sensation Jennifer Lawrence solidifies herself as an movie star and a actress(yea I know she already had Winter's Bone)
The feel good movie of the year
The little film that could(not that little though with the likes of Bradley Cooper, Jennifer Lawrence, and Robert De Niro. Weaver's casting is the only thing not distracting. Only one I kind of bought as someone from Philly)

Lastly I said it was unoffensive, but the more I think about it....it is kind of offensive. This whole cutesy "We're all a little crazy sometimes" is an annoying way of trivializing bipolar disorder.
:clap: Agreed.

User avatar
Posts: 22478
Joined: May 2010
Location: Castle
This is getting out of hand. Its like hes doing national interviews every single freaking day. And this is coming from a #1 fan boy. We get it the movie is legit and he was good in it jeeeezzz.. :crazy:


Why you lurking my page brah?

User avatar
Posts: 3014
Joined: November 2011
Location: North Carolina
Dodd wrote:This is getting out of hand. Its like hes doing national interviews every single freaking day. And this is coming from a #1 fan boy. We get it the movie is legit and he was good in it jeeeezzz.. :crazy:


Maybe you're just proactively looking for his interviews and such, because I haven't seen any of them except for this one you just posted.

User avatar
Forum Pro
Law
Posts: 17034
Joined: July 2010
Location: Moonlight Motel
Skyab23 wrote:
Dodd wrote:This is getting out of hand. Its like hes doing national interviews every single freaking day. And this is coming from a #1 fan boy. We get it the movie is legit and he was good in it jeeeezzz.. :crazy:


Maybe you're just proactively looking for his interviews and such, because I haven't seen any of them except for this one you just posted.

User avatar
Posts: 22478
Joined: May 2010
Location: Castle

Post Reply