I approve.Vader182 wrote:Warrior-
Fucking amazing and heart-wrenching performances that give life to an overly cliched screenplay with terrible editing and direction. Fights were sloppy. While I couldn't get over how awful ..much of the film is objectively, the performances made it incredibly moving and powerful.
No idea what I give it.
-Vader
What was the last movie you've watched? II
Jurassic Park -- 83/100
X-Men: First 7/10
7 out of 10 rating mostly for the god sexy bromance between Magneto and Professor X. And that awesome scene where he stabs the dude and then gets the knife back with his powers. :tooexcited:
7 out of 10 rating mostly for the god sexy bromance between Magneto and Professor X. And that awesome scene where he stabs the dude and then gets the knife back with his powers. :tooexcited:
Your extreme exaggeration makes your reviews phony and not taken seriously.Vader182 wrote:Warrior-
terrible editing and direction. While I couldn't get over how awful
-Vader
chee wrote:X-Men: First Class
that awesome scene where he stabs the dude and then gets the knife back with his powers. :tooexcited:
Magneto had some pretty awesome scenes in the movie.
Allstar wrote:Your extreme exaggeration makes your reviews phony and not taken seriously.Vader182 wrote:Warrior-
terrible editing and direction. While I couldn't get over how awful
-Vader
We all know if you don't think this was better then The Dark Knight then you're trolling. i.e. Vader
I know you're trolling, but I didn't realize the word 'terrible' was 'extreme exaggeration', nor did I realize that about 'sloppy', and those are two complaints not uncommon on this site and from loads of people in general. If you're going to troll someone, at least attempt being half clever about it instead of just blatantly saying random inflammatory things.Allstar wrote:Your extreme exaggeration makes your reviews phony and not taken seriously.Vader182 wrote:Warrior-
terrible editing and direction. While I couldn't get over how awful
-Vader
-Vader
I am not trolling, saying the directing is terrible and the film is awful mostly without giving a single reason why is completely absurd and something I refuse to take seriously.Vader182 wrote:I know you're trolling, but I didn't realize the word 'terrible' was 'extreme exaggeration', nor did I realize that about 'sloppy', and those are two complaints not uncommon on this site and from loads of people in general. If you're going to troll someone, at least attempt being half clever about it instead of just blatantly saying random inflammatory things.Allstar wrote:
Your extreme exaggeration makes your reviews phony and not taken seriously.
-Vader
Blade Runner (1982)
Rating: 9.5/10
Personal Interest's Rate: 9.6/10
Third fav of all time
-------------------------------------------
The Prestige (2006)
Rating: 9.4/10
Personal Interest's Rate: 9.6/10
Fourth fav of all time
Rating: 9.5/10
Personal Interest's Rate: 9.6/10
Third fav of all time
-------------------------------------------
The Prestige (2006)
Rating: 9.4/10
Personal Interest's Rate: 9.6/10
Fourth fav of all time
Out of curiosity, what's number 1 and 3?mastervirgo wrote:Blade Runner (1982)
Rating: 9.5/10
Personal Interest's Rate: 9.6/10
Second fav of all time
-------------------------------------------
The Prestige (2006)
Rating: 9.4/10
Personal Interest's Rate: 9.6/10
Fourth fav of all time
"It doesn't matter how you get knocked down in life because that's going to happen. All that matters is you gotta get up."
I made a mistake. Blade Runner is my third favorite.DoubleD wrote:Out of curiosity, what's number 1 and 3?
1. Lord of the Rings: The Return of the King (2003)
Rating: 9.5/10
PIR: 9.7/10
2. A Clockwork Orange (1971)
Rating: 9.7/10
PIR: 9.7/10