What was the last movie you've watched? II

All non-Nolan related film, tv, and streaming discussions.
User avatar
Posts: 20188
Joined: June 2010
Location: The White City
Cinematography is lighting and technical image composition, not just how pretty the images are on screen. It's why the cinematography in 127 Hours sucked, but still was beautiful because it filmed beautiful locations.

I just think the integrity of a film has more to do with how well it takes advantage of a medium rather than if specific elements overshadowed everything else for you. It's a whole, and I never stop viewing it as such.

-Vader

User avatar
Posts: 1883
Joined: March 2009
Location: Leiden
Gremlins 2: The New Batch

Fantastic bizare movie!
7/10!
David emerges from the store slowly. He braces himself against a parked car and then keeps on walking in a nightmarish daze.

WE PULL BACK as David blends in with dozens and dozens of ordinary people, walking on an ordinary street, in an ordinary city.

User avatar
Posts: 43129
Joined: May 2010
Allstar wrote:
and it only has those actors because of a friendship to the screenwriter, not because they thought it was a great script or whatever.
Please take this comment back...

User avatar
Posts: 21411
Joined: June 2010
Location: All-Hail Master Virgo, Censor of NolanFans
Vader182 wrote:I just think the integrity of a film has more to do with how well it takes advantage of a medium rather than if specific elements overshadowed everything else for you. It's a whole, and I never stop viewing it as such.
And this is why you won't see the beauty in the beast...

User avatar
Posts: 20369
Joined: June 2010
Contagion - 8.7/10

The Flowers of War - 8.6/10

Tinker Tailor Soldier Spy - 7.5/10

In Time - 8/10

Drive - 9.3/10

Titanic - 9.8/10

The Lion King - 10/10

Mason wrote:Just realised, we reached a thousand pages.

Damn.
Well it's more like 1700 pages.

User avatar
Posts: 43129
Joined: May 2010
Allstar wrote:
Allstar wrote:
Please take this comment back...
Vader stop ignoring my posts and just take it back your claim is 100% inaccurate and has zero merit.

User avatar
Posts: 20188
Joined: June 2010
Location: The White City
Chill your shit, stop acting so juvenile. I wasn't 100% inaccurate, dude, I just mixed up which one was friends with the screenwriter, so what? My point about it still holds.

-Vader

User avatar
Posts: 43129
Joined: May 2010
Vader182 wrote:Chill your shit, stop acting so juvenile. I wasn't 100% inaccurate, dude, I just mixed up which one was friends with the screenwriter, so what? My point about it still holds.

-Vader
and it only has those actors because of a friendship to the screenwriter
One actor of the whole cast not "actors". Just so false. They got an oscar nominated actress and oscar winning actress that never knew the screen writer. Your point quoted above does not stand at all.... it is just a totally inaccurate. Seth is the only person you can make the point about. I guess he was every actor in the movie. :suicide: Your point above still holds only if you are delusional honestly.


User avatar
Posts: 20188
Joined: June 2010
Location: The White City
-__- he's the one who pushed it into production, and when actors.. nevermind, it's not worth it. You're nitpicking one out of many points since apparently you know I'm right about the others and you've ran out of things to criticize my view on the movie about. You still haven't responded to what I said about Tinker.

-Vader

Locked