Freddy Vs. Jason - 1/10
Wish I hadn't.
Wish I hadn't.
To use the argument that because Clooneys character is shallow in the film, its fine that the film is aswell (when it tries not to)shows why you shouldn't read rottentomatoes to form your opinion (ohh snap). I have an opinion and can defend my arguments because Im a grown ass man. Not the ignorant retard who uses "you didn't get the movie" as an argument. For me, Up in the Air is a slightly above average movie that offers nothing new or interesting that I haven't seen a million times before. It was the "lets find this years quirky indi film, and praise it for no reason" film of 2009. The films explisit and implisitt meaning is so overused and is a pure cliché at this point. Even the filmmaking is bland - example; shooting Clooney in big open spaces (airports, wow that's fresh and clever) to imply his inner state is done so much better in films like lets say Punch-Drunk Love..RIFA wrote:you didn't get the movie. at all. congratulations for being ignorant and assuming that you know what Reitman wanted with this movie. As for your knowledge: the movie succeeds exactly it's purposes. That's why it's a good movie.
For what nightmare on elm street is I really did not think it was as a bad as everyone makes it. Jackie Earl Haley's performance was admirable.RomanM wrote:I watched the remake of Nightmare on Elm Street... ugh so terrible. 3/10.
But I followed it up with some good ol' American Beauty 9.5/10
did you watch another movie? The character was definately the latter without a doubt. 2 "joke" one-liners don't make him comical.RomanM wrote:Hated it and Haley's indecisive performance. If you're going to be comical, be comical. If you going to be sadistic and super dark, do that. If you want to do both, hire a better writer.