Actually, I'm very glad that the trailer doesn't do the film's justice as you guys say. I've said this before and I'll say this again - I'd better have an average (though this ain't average by any means) trailer and a freaking awesome film (which I hope this will be), rather than be blown away by the trailer and be absolutely disappointed by the film itself.

IWatchFilmsNotMovies wrote:

The robots in this look great.

This will be THE movie of the summer............. after Man Of Steel and Pac Rim of course ^^

The budget was 90 mil? Because the film looks like it should have cost closer to 150 to make from the previews. Then again what do I know about movie budgets...

Peace wrote:The budget was 90 mil? Because the film looks like it should have cost closer to 150 to make from the previews. Then again what do I know about movie budgets...

It's all on Blomkamp.

Red Hood wrote:

"This year's Avatar"

Addicted2Movies wrote:

Red Hood wrote:

"This year's Avatar"

lol yeah. That is setting expectation way too high.

Allstar wrote:

Addicted2Movies wrote:
"This year's Avatar"

lol yeah. That is setting expectation way too high.

It was more along the lines of saying that even though the two movies are scifi they seem pretty much nothing alike after that aspect. So "this year's Avatar" is just a really dumb statement in my opinion.