Just a question: we got Wonder Woman, Shazam and Birds of Prey after Snyder put (and stopped putting) his stamp on the DC characters. Why do we now (want to?) go backwards?
I don't think people liked how much of a joke DC superhero films were during the Man of Steel, Batman vs Superman and Suicide Squad days. Who, if anyone, is nostalgic for that stuff and why?
People like that they took the characters, thematics and vision of the world and themes seriously, and doubled down between them being "comic-booky" and cerebral at once.
So to answer your question: those people. I'm not one of them, but I'm not going to pretend they don't exist because I feel differently.
-Vader
But a reason why MoS, BvS and SS are so easy to point to when people say that they are bad is because they take themselves so utterly seriously to be point of being humourless because the execution stinks so badly that the idea of taking anything in these films seriously becomes risible. Grimdark can be done well (Berserk) but it's certainly not been done well by the likes of Zack Snyder.
I guess I just don't see why there is a need to appease the fans of something that did not work and (importantly for the studio) did not perform as well financially as expected, contrary to films like Wonder Woman and Shazam.
But a reason why MoS, BvS and SS are so easy to point to when people say that they are bad is because they take themselves so utterly seriously to be point of being humourless because the execution stinks so badly that the idea of taking anything in these films seriously becomes risible. Grimdark can be done well (Berserk) but it's certainly not been done well by the likes of Zack Snyder.
I guess I just don't see why there is a need to appease the fans of something that did not work and (importantly for the studio) did not perform as well financially as expected, contrary to films like Wonder Woman and Shazam.
You asked who wants them, not whether you or I agree. Don't be solipsistic.
I strongly believe Batfan is the most elaborate, sophisticated troll. He gets to pull of same tricks on us every single time. He does it with detailed, careful and well written repeat of basically one opinion per thread. It's not a thought provoking engagement, a clash of opinions, it's not even a proper conversation since it's one sided. A waste of time.
But a reason why MoS, BvS and SS are so easy to point to when people say that they are bad is because they take themselves so utterly seriously to be point of being humourless because the execution stinks so badly that the idea of taking anything in these films seriously becomes risible. Grimdark can be done well (Berserk) but it's certainly not been done well by the likes of Zack Snyder.
I guess I just don't see why there is a need to appease the fans of something that did not work and (importantly for the studio) did not perform as well financially as expected, contrary to films like Wonder Woman and Shazam.
You asked who wants them, not whether you or I agree. Don't be solipsistic.
-Vader
Where do you feel these films should go in terms of artistic vision and direction?
I strongly believe Batfan is the most elaborate, sophisticated troll. He gets to pull of same tricks on us every single time. He does it with detailed, careful and well written repeat of basically one opinion per thread. It's not a thought provoking engagement, a clash of opinions, it's not even a proper conversation since it's one sided. A waste of time.
Zack estimates 75% of theatrical was not his, ZS cut is floor level 30 mil. and current issue they have, union wise, is whether it's a 'version' or a 'new movie'... So yeah. All of that from today's interview with WB chairman.
Slashfilm folks argue theatrical wasn't even entirely Whedon as well. It's a mish mash of studio fingers to make a quick buck after what happened to Snyder privately and after they saw Whedon's comic relief mess.