Page 1 of 2

Lady and the Tramp (2019)

Posted: August 23rd, 2019, 10:27 am
by Nomis
Image
Unlike The Lion King, the movie's dogs are set to be played by real animals with VFX presumably only used to portray them talking.
Played by Justin Theroux and Tessa Thompson, Lady and the Tramp will be joined by Janelle Monae as Peg, Sam Elliot as Trusty, Benedict Wong as Bull, and Ashley Jensen as a female version of Jack. On the human side of things, Kiersey Clemons and Thomas Mann will play the Dear family, while Yvette Nicole Brown has been cast as Aunt Sarah.

Re: Lady and the Tramp (2019)

Posted: August 23rd, 2019, 1:50 pm
by Disney+'s solo2001

Re: Lady and the Tramp (2019)

Posted: August 23rd, 2019, 5:06 pm
by Batfan175
Ugh I can't take this anymore. Just ignore these atrocities and watch the 2D animated ones.

Re: Lady and the Tramp (2019)

Posted: August 23rd, 2019, 6:35 pm
by AsianVersionOfET
Disney+'s solo2001 wrote:
August 23rd, 2019, 1:50 pm
Lol

Re: Lady and the Tramp (2019)

Posted: August 23rd, 2019, 8:01 pm
by BlairCo

Re: Lady and the Tramp (2019)

Posted: August 24th, 2019, 3:06 am
by Pratham
why no live action like cats!

Re: Lady and the Tramp (2019)

Posted: August 24th, 2019, 3:07 am
by m4st4
Already better than Lion King!

Babe way is the right way.

Re: Lady and the Tramp (2019)

Posted: August 24th, 2019, 4:34 am
by LelekPL
Why is this better than Lion King? You're still missing the human expressions of classic animation but at least with Lion King, animals didn't have to be used for shooting a film (I'm sure they took good care of the dogs on set but still it's better not to force them to "act" if you can).

I guess you can make a case that it makes more sense financially and that CG animators aren't as overworked and underpayed for their skills as they would normally be, but still, the end result is more or less the same when compared to The Lion King.

Re: Lady and the Tramp (2019)

Posted: August 24th, 2019, 4:41 am
by m4st4
LelekPL wrote:
August 24th, 2019, 4:34 am
Why is this better than Lion King? You're still missing the human expressions of classic animation but at least with Lion King, animals didn't have to be used for shooting a film (I'm sure they took good care of the dogs on set but still it's better not to force them to "act" if you can).

I guess you can make a case that it makes more sense financially and that CG animators aren't as overworked and underpayed for their skills as they would normally be, but still, the end result is more or less the same when compared to The Lion King.
But you won't get human expressions unless it's fully animated via either hand drawn or CGI style (and I'm thinking either Pixar or Disney animation, not photoreal); and with this at least you're getting the real deal, the real animal eyes. And like I said, Babe worked, this works as well. It's simpa, rather than emotionless and bland.

Re: Lady and the Tramp (2019)

Posted: August 24th, 2019, 5:28 am
by Nomis
Pratham wrote:
August 24th, 2019, 3:06 am
why no live action like cats!
don't remind me of that horror