It is a bit...I dont think it was the best picture that year, but its still a great film with a terrific lead performance.
Am I the only one who thinks the Hurt Locker is overrated?
Posts: 2224
Joined:
July 2010
I don't remember people clamoring it to be the second coming of christ, it was a very solid film, and people just didn't want fucking Avatar to get it.
Posts: 9827
Joined:
August 2010
It was a good film but yeah in oscars it was overrated.Inglouriuos Basterds should have won best picture 
only IB was better that year and it was a pretty underwhelming year. It's a good movie and far away from being the "worst" Best Pic winner. "Crash" will hold that place forever
I also don't mind that it won Best Picture, just glad it beat out Avatar. I was hoping "Inglourious Basterds" would take it. THL was a good movie, but it lost my interest too often. By the time it ended, I felt exhausted.
Though, the worst Best Picture winner in history has to be "Shakespeare In Love".
Though, the worst Best Picture winner in history has to be "Shakespeare In Love".
Worst "Best Picture" ever? It undoubtedly has to be Oliver (1968).
Inglourious Basterds or up should have won best picture!
"All this 'good vs evil' shit's been played out. It's now time for 'BAD VS. EVIL'
-David Ayer on Suicide Squad.
-David Ayer on Suicide Squad.
agree with you. also on crash and shakespeare in love... LOL and Slumdog Millionare... another overrated "just-good" movie...kanjisheik wrote:Worst "Best Picture" ever? It undoubtedly has to be Oliver (1968).
It was alright. But nothing special.
Posts: 491
Joined:
September 2010
Up and should've one every award that year. It had so many qualities that modern-day movies just don't have anymore.
