Meraxes wrote:The ending was such a cliche unfitting for Lisbeth's character. The Swedish ending is way cooler.
Whats the Swedish one?
The Fincher one is the same as the book, just a jacket.
Meraxes wrote:The ending was such a cliche unfitting for Lisbeth's character. The Swedish ending is way cooler.
Fincher's ending is same as book? Strange, but ok. I have not read the trilogy so that is said. I simply did not assume her character would do something cliche like that, but perhaps it has its reasons. The Swedish ending never even hinted on Lisbeth falling for Mikael.GothamGirl wrote:Meraxes wrote:The ending was such a cliche unfitting for Lisbeth's character. The Swedish ending is way cooler.
Whats the Swedish one?
The Fincher one is the same as the book, just a jacket.
What's cliche, falling in love for the first time? LOL. And yes, the ending is true to the source material.Meraxes wrote:Fincher's ending is same as book? Strange, but ok. I have not read the trilogy so that is said. I simply did not assume her character would do something cliche like that, but perhaps it has its reasons. The Swedish ending never even hinted on Lisbeth falling for Mikael.GothamGirl wrote:
Whats the Swedish one?
The Fincher one is the same as the book, just a jacket.
Not sure how to even respond to that. Then again, it was a MAN who wrote Lisbeth's characterm4st4 wrote:What's cliche, falling in love for the first time? LOL.
Cliche as in Lisbeth not losing hope after being through SO MUCH in her life. And there was nothing that even indicated why she was falling in love with Mikael. They simply worked and fucked together. At least she got the confirmation she needed before she dumped the gift.prince0gotham wrote:that was in no way cliche, it was cute and touching as fuck especially because what kind of person she is and what she's been through
it's not like the movie started with this and was all about it, it ended with it and gave a reason for the character to not want to ever trust again so what's unfitting about it?
I don't get it. What do you mean ''not losing hope''?Meraxes wrote:Cliche as in Lisbeth not losing hope after being through SO MUCH in her life. And there was nothing that even indicated why she was falling in love with Mikael. They simply worked and fucked together. At least she got the confirmation she needed before she dumped the gift.prince0gotham wrote:that was in no way cliche, it was cute and touching as fuck especially because what kind of person she is and what she's been through
it's not like the movie started with this and was all about it, it ended with it and gave a reason for the character to not want to ever trust again so what's unfitting about it?
there was nothing that indicated it?Meraxes wrote:Cliche as in Lisbeth not losing hope after being through SO MUCH in her life. And there was nothing that even indicated why she was falling in love with Mikael. They simply worked and fucked together. At least she got the confirmation she needed before she dumped the gift.prince0gotham wrote:that was in no way cliche, it was cute and touching as fuck especially because what kind of person she is and what she's been through
it's not like the movie started with this and was all about it, it ended with it and gave a reason for the character to not want to ever trust again so what's unfitting about it?
most people that tell themselves they can't trust anyone are secretly obsessed with the search for someone they CAN trustMeraxes wrote:Fair enough, but Lisbeth's character does not give a fuck about people, and at least not emotionally. She has been through more than enough to never trust anyone. And after working and fucking together with Mikael, she suddenly decides to fall in love? Cliche, yes. Then again, a man wrote her character. It would be interesting if a woman did.