Star Wars Episode IX - The Rise of Skywalker (2019)

All non-Nolan related film, tv, and streaming discussions.
User avatar
Posts: 2572
Joined: January 2011
what da fuck

Posts: 4794
Joined: January 2012
okungnyo wrote: Is this all off the top of your head??
I had to look at my collection and decide which ones I would include in my answer. So it took some time but I managed to narrow it down to those I mentioned.

Posts: 1338
Joined: December 2011
Location: Alabama
Batfan175 wrote:
okungnyo wrote: Is this all off the top of your head??
I had to look at my collection and decide which ones I would include in my answer. So it took some time but I managed to narrow it down to those I mentioned.
It also wasn't exactly what I meant. Yes, I am sure that you have liked movies, but you can like something and still complain about it. Or still be the forum "Well, yeah but..." guy. It's just like every time I see a post from you its something having to do with how it doesn't meet your expectations, even if the majority of the forum sees nothing wrong with it.* Again, it's just being contrarian or pedantic or underwhelmed for the sake of being so. I guess I finally get why though -- if you have enough time on your hands to type that text wall then you have time to find flaws in even the most mundane stuff.

*Yes I know people have varying opinions and that is what makes the forum what it is, but it is seriously so often it has to be intentional.

User avatar
Posts: 2061
Joined: April 2013
lmao

User avatar
Posts: 43129
Joined: May 2010
Kathleen Kennedy to JJ Abrams-

Image

User avatar
Posts: 16716
Joined: March 2012
Would have preferred Johnson.

User avatar
Posts: 26414
Joined: June 2011
Holy crap Batfan

User avatar
Posts: 26396
Joined: February 2010
Location: Houston, Texas
Vader182 wrote:
Cilogy wrote: Having said that, I know I'm in the minority on this - for whatever reason - but he's a boring and uninspiring director with no distinctive vision.

Revisiting with JJ, purely from a business perspective is great, but creatively I think it's actually worse than choosing an inexperienced director. Like, it seems Disney/Lucasfilm are actually kinda ... I don't know, scared? I guess?

Kennedy and co are rushing this and it's turning me off.
TFA has a lot of very distinctive choices, love or hate them.

Examples:

-medieval production design IE crossguard sabers, castles (maz), knights in shining armor (phasma)

-Kurosawa/Spielberg use of blocking and camera movement, combining several shots into one. Effect is sense of characters sharing drama together in uninterrupted moments. Similar in feeling to static shots of Lucas and Kershner keeping multicharacters in-frame but contemporary.

-Visual sparseness to an extreme. In some ways, more so than even A New Hope. Big use of wide open spaces with shrunken towns, cities, squadrons, battles. Jakku=few shacks. Mostly empty space. Resistance base= underground, tiny rooms. Starkiller= mostly empty mountains (exception is firing sequence). Battles have few ships vs a few ships.

^ interestingly, art book for TFA shows earlier designs had median between minimalist and maximalism. JJ kept going smaller and smaller.

-Han and Luke are unlikable cowards and shitty people. Not only did they abandon the galaxy when it's in peril, they helped facilitate the rise of The First Order through Kylo Ren. Han and Leia's shitty parenting and Luke's failure as a teacher caused the crisis Rey and Finn need to solve. So they fucking fled. This, by the way, is an absolute 180 from all expanded universe stories painting them as glorified heroes struggling to lead. Love or hate this choice, but it's nothing if not a "distinctive vision." It deliberately subverted what fans "wanted."

-The recursiveness, while safe and familiar (I get this resets Han to his start at ANH), also contrasts what's changed. IE the separation of Han in TFA to Han in ANH from swashbuckling scoundrel to absent husband, failed father, fleeing war hero, and now a lackluster smuggler. All layers of his persona and image have deteriorated away. (Almost) everything that made Han great is gone. (the medieval aesthetics communicate lost time/failed society/systems etc)

The sparseness of the worlds and the dark ages aesthetic relates to the hollow voids left behind by Han and Luke and Leia. The realization by the new heroes that Han and Luke suck is of disappointment and confusion. Not a coincidence that Rey's first big confrontation with Ren throws his fetishized Vader legacy back in his face. He'll never be able to BE Darth Vader in the same way that Han Solo can't be our old Han Solo and Luke Skywalker won't be our old Luke Skywalker. These pieces fit. You can hate these ideas, you can hate these puzzle pieces, but I still, and will always, fail to see how this is playing it safe. I think the fact it seems as safe as it does relates more to the success of those elements than it does the derivative Tie Fighters, X-Wings, or recursive story.


Kasdan and Abrams tried finding a balance between exploring new content and new ideas while using old visual ideas and story structures. For most people, including me, that balance was imperfect. How imperfect? Your mileage will vary. But Marvel Fast Food Happy Meal Number 7? Please. Not even close. This is full of directorial ideas, thematic ideas, story ideas. Ideas that are largely cohesive. Do I hope The Last Jedi and Episode IX continues exploring these ideas without the derivative veneer of the OT? Absofuckinglutely.

All I can say is watch TFA before TLJ with these things in mind and let me know if it changes how you feel about it.



-Vader
Sorry, I didn't see this.

Thank you for the write-up, I'm going to rewatch this with all of that in mind.

User avatar
Oku
Posts: 3759
Joined: May 2012
I did that a few days ago, too; I tried to give The Force Awakens a rewatch because Vader182's detailed post made me want to reconsider my dislike of the movie.

But no...it did not.

User avatar
Posts: 9849
Joined: October 2011
Location: Foot of Mt. Belzoni
As much as I appreciate Vader's TFA apologias I can't help but think of Futurama's "technically correct, the best kind of correct"

Post Reply