Didn't like Looper that much and in this case I agree with Vader.
Would like to be proven wrong tho.
Would like to be proven wrong tho.
I liked Looper but Brick is my fav from him (a better movie imo)RIFA wrote:Didn't like Looper that much and in this case I agree with Vader.
Would like to be proven wrong tho.
MagnarTheGreat wrote:
I don't like Breaking Bad. Seeing the early episodes turned me off at the concept and that was it for me.
Honestly, I'm unsure about Johnson being involved, but we quite literally have an entire fansite devoted to someone who has proven your theory wrong.Vader182 wrote:Johnson is an idea man. The strongest aspects of Looper are conceptual, not cinematic. Star Wars is what people mean when they say the movies, that abstract notion of romanticizing the movie going experience that, while it happens to us film fans all the time, it somehow, for one night, makes everyone feel like a serious enthusiast of film. In a word (or two): movie magic. It isn't intellectual, it isn't cerebral. It's an eyes-wide-open thrill ride; it's unapologetic, unadulterated adventure. Star Wars is pure cinema. But none of these qualities have been present in Johnson's work. I'm puzzled and disappointed by this choice.m4st4 wrote:Explain.Vader182 wrote:Bad move.
-Vader
-Vader
LOL at this. Somebody get this kid some tissues. Get over it man. Puzzled and disappointed It's a fucking movie man not life or death. You'll be right there in the theaters like everybody else when this comes out.Vader182 wrote:Johnson is an idea man. The strongest aspects of Looper are conceptual, not cinematic. Star Wars is what people mean when they say the movies, that abstract notion of romanticizing the movie going experience that, while it happens to us film fans all the time, it somehow, for one night, makes everyone feel like a serious enthusiast of film. In a word (or two): movie magic. It isn't intellectual, it isn't cerebral. It's an eyes-wide-open thrill ride; it's unapologetic, unadulterated adventure. Star Wars is pure cinema. But none of these qualities have been present in Johnson's work. I'm puzzled and disappointed by this choice.m4st4 wrote:Explain.Vader182 wrote:Bad move.
-Vader
-Vader
dude. some people care more about cinema than you'll ever be able to imaginebootsy wrote:LOL at this. Somebody get this kid some tissues. Get over it man. Puzzled and disappointed It's a fucking movie man not life or death. You'll be right there in the theaters like everybody else when this comes out.Vader182 wrote:
Johnson is an idea man. The strongest aspects of Looper are conceptual, not cinematic. Star Wars is what people mean when they say the movies, that abstract notion of romanticizing the movie going experience that, while it happens to us film fans all the time, it somehow, for one night, makes everyone feel like a serious enthusiast of film. In a word (or two): movie magic. It isn't intellectual, it isn't cerebral. It's an eyes-wide-open thrill ride; it's unapologetic, unadulterated adventure. Star Wars is pure cinema. But none of these qualities have been present in Johnson's work. I'm puzzled and disappointed by this choice.
-Vader
The Phantom Menace and Attack of the Clones are fucking movies.bootsy wrote: It's a fucking movie man not life or death.