It's called a cover.Law wrote:Interesting developments, but the music in the show from what I remember has way more than that.Vader182 wrote:are you having a laugh?Law wrote:I need the score for when Maive is getting the tour .. absolutely amazing
aint score mate
-Vader
Westworld (TV)
Posts: 55632
Joined:
May 2010
Ruth wrote:^Honestly, I've never watched Person of Interest, except for a few episodes I randomly caught on tv, so I can't comment on that. But that bit from TDKR never seemed very realistic to me haha. I guess it is possible (and probable) in Westworld, though it seems a little too elaborate atm.
Can't believe I didn't see this earlier.
Peter Abernathy's threat to Ford and Bernard in "The Original".
He thinks he's threatening the two founders of the park.
They hinted at it right away. "Are you watching closely", indeed.
Peter Abernathy's threat to Ford and Bernard in "The Original".
"The Stray" revealed that he's very likely a first generation host. If he's recalling memories of old builds, he's probably going all the way back to his earliest ones. To a time where he's had sessions with both Ford and Arnold. If the Bernard/Arnold theory is true, this whole scene gets a new dimension, for in Peter's point-of-view:'I shall have such revenges on you... BOTH.'
He thinks he's threatening the two founders of the park.
They hinted at it right away. "Are you watching closely", indeed.
Posts: 782
Joined:
May 2010
Watching Maeve crashed her own system when looking at the tablet at her own speech is kinda disturbing so does
"The Adversary" also established that the older generation hosts have transmission receivers, through which signals can be relayed into.
Think how many of them, are decommissioned and kept in cold storage. If Bernard really is a non-human entity modeled after Arnold, & has already been 'subconsciously awakened' by the creator himself (think of him being like Ginny Weasley in The Chamber of Secrets, while the voice of Arnold is like Tom Riddle's diary, egging him on), & does things that push Arnold's vision, without his knowledge. He could decommission the older hosts, but not do so completely, so that they can receive signals that could lead to their awakening. And besides Theresa, he may've been the second mole that Elsie was alluding to, who's been issuing modifications to hosts (as she found Arnold's name in the old system).
There may've been an instance of this "not total decommissioning" in 'The Original' itself, when Bernard whispers something to Peter, before sending him off to storage. He doesn't do the same to Walter, because he's probably the current generation, while Peter is not.
Think how many of them, are decommissioned and kept in cold storage. If Bernard really is a non-human entity modeled after Arnold, & has already been 'subconsciously awakened' by the creator himself (think of him being like Ginny Weasley in The Chamber of Secrets, while the voice of Arnold is like Tom Riddle's diary, egging him on), & does things that push Arnold's vision, without his knowledge. He could decommission the older hosts, but not do so completely, so that they can receive signals that could lead to their awakening. And besides Theresa, he may've been the second mole that Elsie was alluding to, who's been issuing modifications to hosts (as she found Arnold's name in the old system).
There may've been an instance of this "not total decommissioning" in 'The Original' itself, when Bernard whispers something to Peter, before sending him off to storage. He doesn't do the same to Walter, because he's probably the current generation, while Peter is not.
Last edited by ChrisTilford on November 8th, 2016, 12:17 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Or the "Park" effect?Vader182 wrote:Pratham that's the only reasonable explanation I've heard but it's still a huge contrivance regardless. When your "smart" characters act really stupid, it completely undermines not just the credibility of the individual characters but the intregrity of the overall product. The Prometheus effect, basically.
-Vader
But it does leave room for inevitable questioning of plot integrity and it shouldn't so I would really appreciate it if we didn't have to wait 2 episodes.
Ranking: 1,4,5/6,3,2. I feel it would change once I see it all again though.
The difference I guess is that character in JP is shown to be a buffoon from the start so it's just dramatic irony that his own stupidity leads to his own death, whereas here you just have people acting real dumb to move the plot alone and contrive suspense/tension/mystery. Besides,
wouldn't it have been way more compelling if Maeve..
-Vader
wouldn't it have been way more compelling if Maeve..
-Vader
Posts: 55632
Joined:
May 2010
Guy's a moron but he can evidently do way more than the other dude and Maeve even says so? The whole thing happened because he is not stupid and the other guy is, therefore it's easier to put him into submission, while the other one clearly adores the hosts, like prince said.
Edit: I don't believe he forgot to put her into sleep (episode 2). Someone else is playing with the hosts.
Edit: I don't believe he forgot to put her into sleep (episode 2). Someone else is playing with the hosts.