Re: Last Film You Watched? V
Posted: August 1st, 2016, 8:09 am
Dunno how many times I've watched this scene, but probably more than a hundred
Discussion forums for the premiere fan community for and by fans of film director Christopher Nolan.
https://www.nolanfans.com/forums/
Hard exposition would be if Nolan literally walked in front of the camera and spelled out what's going on.RIFA wrote:Inception is the worst for me.
I just can't get through 60+ minutes of hard exposition after repeated viewings. It gives me a headache.
Cilogy wrote:Hard exposition would be if Nolan literally walked in front of the camera and spelled out what's going on.RIFA wrote:Inception is the worst for me.
I just can't get through 60+ minutes of hard exposition after repeated viewings. It gives me a headache.
By that logic, The Matrix (a clear source of inspiration) also had headache inducing hard exposition.
It's not nearly that bad, especially when the "exposition" part is not only intended to be entertaining, but also carries emotional and psychological meaning. It's also integral to understanding the rules of the universe (which are subsequently broken as the film progresses for thematic and narrative reasons). Cobb is teaching and guiding Ariadne through the second act, and then that dynamic is turned on its head as Ariadne begins to truly understand the depth of Cobb's psychosis. It's the whole basis for both the unreliable narrator and traitorous mentor tropes Nolan uses in his films.
The exposition scenes are there not only to explain the rules, but also have the audience subconsciously place their trust in Cobb until that's used against them as the film goes on.
Not only that, but the so called "exposition" scenes are entirely about exploring the limits of creativity and consciousness. These scenes work on quite a few levels, the "exposition" aspect is the least of it. Not to mention the cold open is cinematic storytelling at its finest.Cilogy wrote:Hard exposition would be if Nolan literally walked in front of the camera and spelled out what's going on.RIFA wrote:Inception is the worst for me.
I just can't get through 60+ minutes of hard exposition after repeated viewings. It gives me a headache.
By that logic, The Matrix (a clear source of inspiration) also had headache inducing hard exposition.
It's not nearly that bad, especially when the "exposition" part is not only intended to be entertaining, but also carries emotional and psychological meaning. It's also integral to understanding the rules of the universe (which are subsequently broken as the film progresses for thematic and narrative reasons). Cobb is teaching and guiding Ariadne through the second act, and then that dynamic is turned on its head as Ariadne begins to truly understand the depth of Cobb's psychosis. It's the whole basis for both the unreliable narrator and traitorous mentor tropes Nolan uses in his films.
The exposition scenes are there not only to explain the rules, but also have the audience subconsciously place their trust in Cobb until that's used against them as the film goes on.
We're talking about Inception, not TDKR.m4st4 wrote:I have a feeling you guys won't have much else to say once we hit Nolan peaks in dedicated thread but oh well... Apropos exposition I'm fine with it until Mendelsohn says: 'A clean slate... You mean the program that wipes away your criminal record blah-blah' (paraphrasing), god I hate that part every time even if it's necessary.
Thanks! Pace yourselves boys, we have nine weeks to fill that thread with gems (Pedal faster! Exposition maestro! How did Bruce sneak past Bane's guards in TDKR etc. etc)Cilogy wrote:I actually have a theory to very conveniently justify shit like that in TDKR, which I'll save for the viewing party.