Man of Steel (2013)

All non-Nolan related film, tv, and streaming discussions.
User avatar
Posts: 16015
Joined: June 2011
Location: New York City
RyanRises wrote:
Jax_Teller wrote:To each his own, MOS is way more emotional to me.
Perhaps you're just a chump?
Ryan I will find you, cut your chest open with a saw, use a hammer to smash your ribs and stab you in the heart with your own goddamn rib while you bleed out if you keep trolling the MOS board

User avatar
Posts: 2863
Joined: January 2013
Location: Hogwarts
RyanRises wrote:
Jax_Teller wrote:To each his own, MOS is way more emotional to me.
Perhaps you're just a chump?
Reported.

User avatar
Posts: 2095
Joined: April 2010
TehBatGetsBraked wrote:
RyanRises wrote:
Jax_Teller wrote:To each his own, MOS is way more emotional to me.
Perhaps you're just a chump?
Ryan I will find you, cut your chest open with a saw, use a hammer to smash your ribs and stab you in the heart with your own goddamn rib while you bleed out if you keep trolling the MOS board

Image

Posts: 2048
Joined: April 2012
Why would it depend on Amazing Spider-Man? Lost me there.

User avatar
Posts: 3855
Joined: June 2010
Joeyjojo72 wrote:Why would it depend on Amazing Spider-Man? Lost me there.
sorry, I mean MOS needs to do the same as amazing spider man, that made 262 million in the U.S. and 490 million worldwide, to have a second film.

User avatar
Posts: 4761
Joined: June 2012
Location: Gotham City
Does anyone think that the original ending with zod getting sent to the phantom zone was a better ending?

User avatar
Posts: 4761
Joined: June 2012
Location: Gotham City
Agreed I think in the end this was a far better ending. I just want to hear what people thoughts on it

User avatar
Posts: 749
Joined: May 2013
Henry Cavill

Kevin Costner

Antje Traue


Russell Crowe

Laurence Fishburne

Amy Adams

User avatar
Posts: 5219
Joined: January 2012
It would've been so easy for established actors like Crowe and Costner to shoehorn for this film and yet they both gave emotional and powerful performances :clap:

Posts: 211
Joined: May 2012
Now Where Was I ? wrote:
Law wrote:Spoiler
Image
Am I the only one feeling Cavill's Clark Kent with glasses isn't a good disguise at all, maybe it's because the haircut and the attitude (he only said a line to Lois who already knows the truth though) seems to be the same IDK
Reeve's Clark was so different, I honestly think it was tough to associate him with Superman
we don't really know what clark kent is going to be like in metropolis. in the film
we see clark traveling around and in smallville. he hasn't exactly been to metropolis to live a consistent life working at the daily planet and his interaction with those people. clark could go into a similar route like reeve's clark in metropolis, but i'm not sure if they will or if it's needed.


i was just watching the animated series and i didn't see clark in metropolis like reeve's clark kent. this is something that continues to bother me with this whole comparison b/t the earlier superman films and today's. we're not going to see a repeat of donner/christopher reeve's portrayal. i feel like no matter what interpretation we would've gotten today, people will forever compare and it's not necessary.

as for the disguise of clark just wearing glasses, i don't know what to tell you. that has always been something that bothered me beside lois always being blind to pay attention and see that her co-worker is superman.

Post Reply