wrong threadRuth wrote:Someone just lock this thread.
http://www.nolanfans.com/forums/viewtop ... ead#unread
wrong threadRuth wrote:Someone just lock this thread.
Yeh I cant deny that, I'm just saying he's always had a problem with consistency. In the early 2000's it seemed like he kind of fixed that and it seemed almost like he was a new person... but it didn't last long, and now it's worse than ever yes.shauner111 wrote:Yes, but don't you think there's been too many in a row in the last 10 to 15 years compared to before? He has never been a consistent director. But now it's getting much worse.ComptonTerry wrote:I don't know how much Scott's age has to do with the quality of is work. There was always the "Someone To Watch Over Me's" and the G.I. Janes" and stuff. I think age has made his problems worse then before, but he's never been known for making consiatently good films. Gladiator was his first real hit I like 20 years (18 to be precise)
It's a shame, really. Not sure if I should waste my money on this.shauner111 wrote:It's at 43 % on Rotten Tomatoes.
shauner111 wrote:It's at 43 % on Rotten Tomatoes.
lmaom4st4 wrote:Zero Sunday School for the critics back in the days confirmed.