Mad Max: Fury Road (2015)

All non-Nolan related film, tv, and streaming discussions.
User avatar
Posts: 21
Joined: April 2015
Location: MISSOURI
How can anybody be bothered with anything when Tom Hardy is on the screen ;)

User avatar
Posts: 20188
Joined: June 2010
Location: The White City
Allstar wrote:
Vader182 wrote:Nostalgia.
Nostalgia is denial, denial of the painful present... the name for this denial is golden age thinking, the erroneous notion that a different time period is better than the one one's living in. It's a flaw in the romantic imagination of those people who find it difficult to cope with the present.
How people actually let things like this bother them is beyond me.


-Vader
It's funny you post that since my friends reference it to make fun of me all the time lol.


-Vader

User avatar
Posts: 1957
Joined: August 2012
ChristNolan wrote:I fucking hate the term "beyond me". How is it beyond you? Are you God or something?
Can you tell I'm bored yet
Sorry, it was just too hard to resist. :lol:
SomeFrenchToast wrote:wow some of these posts are so stupid
They're not any worse than yours in the Jurassic World thread, really.
ImageJk, lol.

ChristNolan wrote:I also hate when people use the word "picture" instead of film or movie. This isn't the 20s anymore gramps, no one should use it in a casual conversation.

"Wanna go to the movies later, bro?"

"Yes I would be quite fond of viewing a nice motion picture this evening, yes yes."

The fuck?
The proper term is photo-play you filthy commoner.

User avatar
Posts: 13944
Joined: June 2009
Location: La La Land
Admittedly in my film essays I'll use the phrase "picture" to mix it up. My prose gets stale if I'm using "film" and "movie" multiple times in a single paragraph.

Posts: 3728
Joined: June 2011
Crazy Eight wrote:Admittedly in my film essays I'll use the phrase "picture" to mix it up. My prose gets stale if I'm using "film" and "movie" multiple times in a single paragraph.
That's fine. I think we're talking about using it in conversation.

User avatar
Posts: 2076
Joined: August 2012
Location: The Wasteland
QueenofHearts wrote: According to boxoffice.com - MM has made over 211 million world wide with an estimated budget of 210 million of which I thought I read initially was 150 million??? maybe I misread....
All I've ever heard is $150 mill, so perhaps the $210 mill includes the promotional budget. And they certainly promoted this film right.

User avatar
Posts: 13944
Joined: June 2009
Location: La La Land
Baniac wrote:
QueenofHearts wrote: According to boxoffice.com - MM has made over 211 million world wide with an estimated budget of 210 million of which I thought I read initially was 150 million??? maybe I misread....
All I've ever heard is $150 mill, so perhaps the $210 mill includes the promotional budget. And they certainly promoted this film right.
Doubt it. The film's production budget has been in rumored dispute for quite a while. Marketing and distribution numbers are always filed separately, so I wouldn't be shocked if it turned out the production did actually cost $210m.

User avatar
Posts: 21
Joined: April 2015
Location: MISSOURI
I just rechecked and was looking to see if I could find out some more info and it said that the total sales were a combination of production budget figures and domesticated P&A costs (est) so it seems like it's a combination of both. Im sure there are some obvious estimates in there, but I think everything will good in the end or at least very decent, but certainly not a failure :twothumbsup:

User avatar
Posts: 21
Joined: April 2015
Location: MISSOURI
Sorry for the double post! A better pic of Max's tattoos....Poor Baby! If you all can't see it I will try to save a larger pic- shows how jacked up that world was " psychotic- keep muzzled- lone road warrior"
Image

Post Reply