no matter who wins
we all lose
we all lose
Year after HE GOT AN OSCAR? Come the fuck on, be realistic here.ChristNolan wrote:Just returned from my 4th viewing of Interstellar. McC not getting any consideration for Best Actor is a complete sham. It's far and away his best film performance.
Tom Hanks realistic enough?m4st4 wrote:Year after HE GOT AN OSCAR? Come the fuck on, be realistic here.ChristNolan wrote:Just returned from my 4th viewing of Interstellar. McC not getting any consideration for Best Actor is a complete sham. It's far and away his best film performance.
Hanks, Hepburn, Tracy, Robardsm4st4 wrote:Year after HE GOT AN OSCAR? Come the fuck on, be realistic here.ChristNolan wrote:Just returned from my 4th viewing of Interstellar. McC not getting any consideration for Best Actor is a complete sham. It's far and away his best film performance.
Tom Hanks gave the best performance both in 1993 and 1994. Spencer Tracy, Katherine Hepburn and Jason Robards also won in consecutive years.the_red_ninja wrote:Tom Hanks realistic enough?m4st4 wrote:Year after HE GOT AN OSCAR? Come the fuck on, be realistic here.ChristNolan wrote:Just returned from my 4th viewing of Interstellar. McC not getting any consideration for Best Actor is a complete sham. It's far and away his best film performance.
just saying
I don't care about the statistics, I'm talking Academy right now, added on the fact that Interstellar has no reason to expect anything besides technical stuff because... politics? Bad timing? Don't know but it is how it is.ArmandFancypants wrote:Hanks, Hepburn, Tracy, Robardsm4st4 wrote:Year after HE GOT AN OSCAR? Come the fuck on, be realistic here.ChristNolan wrote:Just returned from my 4th viewing of Interstellar. McC not getting any consideration for Best Actor is a complete sham. It's far and away his best film performance.
I don't think that it is so much about politics or timing. It just seems that critics and voters didn't love it that much. Unfortunately.m4st4 wrote:I don't care about the statistics, I'm talking Academy right now, added on the fact that Interstellar has no reason to expect anything besides technical stuff because... politics? Bad timing? Don't know but it is how it is.
Just wanted to add that (most important) factor as well - yes.Panapaok wrote:I don't think that it is so much about politics or timing. It just seems that critics and voters didn't love it that much. Unfortunately.m4st4 wrote:I don't care about the statistics, I'm talking Academy right now, added on the fact that Interstellar has no reason to expect anything besides technical stuff because... politics? Bad timing? Don't know but it is how it is.
What do you think they'll think?ArmandFancypants wrote:We don't really have a strong idea of what AMPAS thinks about it yet at all, though...