Star Trek Into Darkness: IMAX
I can't think of a particular film that more aptly fits the phrase "It had it's moments" than this one. Bare with me, as I think 3D significantly diminishes ones ability to judge a films visuals, but nonetheless I'll state my thoughts of the present. Like it's predecessor, Into Darkness lacks much geography in it's photography, and I don't merely apply this to the lack of on-site shooting, but to the filmmaker's seemingly ignoring how distance and movement works. Frames are cluttered, lens flares overbearing each image, and the movement and composition is jarring at best, leading to some pretty fucking awfully shot action sequences. The 3D did nothing but further add to the messy images on screen, and constant seemingly unplanned IMAX footage sporadically shifting the ratio made it even worse. I'd like to see it in 2D, how it was actually intended, for which I'll wait until it arrives on Blu-ray.
I can't think of a particular film that more aptly fits the phrase "It had it's moments" than this one. Bare with me, as I think 3D significantly diminishes ones ability to judge a films visuals, but nonetheless I'll state my thoughts of the present. Like it's predecessor, Into Darkness lacks much geography in it's photography, and I don't merely apply this to the lack of on-site shooting, but to the filmmaker's seemingly ignoring how distance and movement works. Frames are cluttered, lens flares overbearing each image, and the movement and composition is jarring at best, leading to some pretty fucking awfully shot action sequences. The 3D did nothing but further add to the messy images on screen, and constant seemingly unplanned IMAX footage sporadically shifting the ratio made it even worse. I'd like to see it in 2D, how it was actually intended, for which I'll wait until it arrives on Blu-ray.