Sometimes I think you are Lex Luthorryan4butler wrote:Wrong.Allstar wrote:
What was the last movie you watched? IV
I wish.banepants wrote:Sometimes I think you are Lex Luthorryan4butler wrote: Wrong.
Brave New World
END OF WATCH:
I would say my fifth favorite of the year. Really surprised how much I liked it.The ending could have been better though.
I would say my fifth favorite of the year. Really surprised how much I liked it.The ending could have been better though.
Agreed. What did you think of the on screen chemistry?Durden_77 wrote:END OF WATCH:
I would say my fifth favorite of the year. Really surprised how much I liked it.The ending could have been better though.
Why you lurking my page brah?
Really good.Dodd wrote:Agreed. What did you think of the on screen chemistry?Durden_77 wrote:END OF WATCH:
I would say my fifth favorite of the year. Really surprised how much I liked it.The ending could have been better though.
Posts: 19
Joined:
November 2012
Skyfall
Absolutely loved it, one of the best movies of the year. Javier Bardem was genius as the villain Silva. Daniel Craig was reliable as ever as Bond. To say that it's an improvement on Quantum of Solace would be an understatement.
9/10
Absolutely loved it, one of the best movies of the year. Javier Bardem was genius as the villain Silva. Daniel Craig was reliable as ever as Bond. To say that it's an improvement on Quantum of Solace would be an understatement.
9/10
Gave it same rating.jimmytwotime wrote:Skyfall
Absolutely loved it, one of the best movies of the year. Javier Bardem was genius as the villain Silva. Daniel Craig was reliable as ever as Bond. To say that it's an improvement on Quantum of Solace would be an understatement.
9/10
Matchstick Men (2003)
Rating: 8.3/10
Personal Interest's Rating: 8.1/10
The good thing about Scott is that he likes to try and make different films (Not someone like Van Sant or Soderberg though, who sometimes are really lost) and he doesn't insist on forcing his style over them when there is no need for it. That's why he's such a versatile director. If you are a producer and you got your hands on a very good script you always know Scott is one of the best choices out there, because he can make almost any kinds of film.
That's what I like to see in a film director. Someone with his own way of film making but still open to make films without the need to have that way. Scorsese is probably the best living director who works like that.
Kubrick tried a lot of genres but he kept his own style everytime. Even though I admire the guy I think that made him a limited director, there were a lot of great opportunities for him to explore the cinema and wouldn't work with his style. Malick is another example. You need to know when you should let go of something.
Rating: 8.3/10
Personal Interest's Rating: 8.1/10
The good thing about Scott is that he likes to try and make different films (Not someone like Van Sant or Soderberg though, who sometimes are really lost) and he doesn't insist on forcing his style over them when there is no need for it. That's why he's such a versatile director. If you are a producer and you got your hands on a very good script you always know Scott is one of the best choices out there, because he can make almost any kinds of film.
That's what I like to see in a film director. Someone with his own way of film making but still open to make films without the need to have that way. Scorsese is probably the best living director who works like that.
Kubrick tried a lot of genres but he kept his own style everytime. Even though I admire the guy I think that made him a limited director, there were a lot of great opportunities for him to explore the cinema and wouldn't work with his style. Malick is another example. You need to know when you should let go of something.
Forgot about Looper this is my 6th fave.Durden_77 wrote:END OF WATCH:
I would say my fifth favorite of the year. Really surprised how much I liked it.The ending could have been better though.
Does anyone else think the ending would have been way better if:
How that's relevant?SilverHeart wrote:I just think it feels like if suddenly superpowers existed in Nolan's Batman series, IMO.