No it didn'tsolo2001 wrote:This was sarcasm... Hopefully that got throughCilogy wrote: I'm guessing your bedroom is below sea level ...
Nevermind then.
If she plays cranium she gives good brainium.
No it didn'tsolo2001 wrote:This was sarcasm... Hopefully that got throughCilogy wrote: I'm guessing your bedroom is below sea level ...
+1talli wrote:overman, you do realize that if they had recast the joker, it would simply create a discontinuation, because it would be impossible for another actor to play the joker the way heath did.....there would be a discrepancy...and the joker that you would want to see return for the 3rd movie, simply wouldnt be there...it would be an entirely different beast
and do you know that characters are supposed to evolve or change, is the nature of storytelling why don't you o ask Nolan if he's not recasting the joker because no actor in the world could do it the way Ledger did or if it was because he wasn't comfortable for X or Y personal reasons, you're argument is the kind of thing someone that can't get out of the Heath Ledger box would say, it has nothing to do with discontinuation, I think even you know that's bullshit, whatever the joker could have been at the third film is a result of what happened on the second film, thus it wouldn't be the same thing, I know you're in love with Heath to death but... C'mon!talli wrote:overman, you do realize that if they had recast the joker, it would simply create a discontinuation, because it would be impossible for another actor to play the joker the way heath did.....there would be a discrepancy...and the joker that you would want to see return for the 3rd movie, simply wouldnt be there...it would be an entirely different beast
no, i'm speaking objectively....yes the joker could evolve, in the aspect of his psychology, but what about his physicality? his mannerisms, gestures, facial ticks....those were born out of Heath's subconscious...they were organic...how could another actor make something organic that's not his? it's impossible.OVERMAN wrote:and do you know that characters are supposed to evolve or change, is the nature of storytelling why don't you o ask Nolan if he's not recasting the joker because no actor in the world could do it the way Ledger did or if it was because he wasn't comfortable for X or Y personal reasons, you're argument is the kind of thing someone that can't get out of the Heath Ledger box would say, it has nothing to do with discontinuation, I think even you know that's bullshit, whatever the joker could have been at the third film is a result of what happened on the second film, thus it wouldn't be the same thing, I know you're in love with Heath to death but... C'mon!talli wrote:overman, you do realize that if they had recast the joker, it would simply create a discontinuation, because it would be impossible for another actor to play the joker the way heath did.....there would be a discrepancy...and the joker that you would want to see return for the 3rd movie, simply wouldnt be there...it would be an entirely different beast
OVERMAN wrote:ha ha ha let's give imagination a little chance OK?, it was the reason why Ledger got that job in the first place...
OVERMAN wrote:I think your imagination or peace of mind pretty much spins around the fact that this actor Ledger is some sort of God, do really think any director with common sense would hire someone who can only copy what this guy did on the last movie, once again there are many actors who could bring something new and unique, beyond the fact that Ledger brought the gestures and the laugh and the individuality to that acting in that movie, this character was also written in pages, it was worked, constructed also with the filmmakers from the same pages of the same story, it wasn't magically created by one man, some time ago Nolan sat with this guy and told him exactly what he had in mind,