AhmadAli95 wrote:Putting IMAX cameras in the cockpit of a Spitfire. Incredible achievement.

They did not do that.

Samuel R. Jankis wrote:

AhmadAli95 wrote:I hate to admit it but I haven't seen that movie yet. But no, like literally three seperate films. Think of Gravity and Aningaaq.

You haven't seen Pulp Fiction

And you don't have to, its not that great.

Ah I see. I was just wondering about the one at Arnhem because that's the only (digi) IMAX in our country that has got Dolby Atmos too. I know it's not mixed in that but the sound at Arena was so incredibly shrill and overall just too loud. Perhaps the one at Eindhoven has also got Dolby Atmos? Sin...

Was this one posted before?

Bacon wrote:[
You don't have to reply to every response.

Lol, indeed.

MyCocaine wrote:Reported.

Your lack of insight and historical knowledge is not only offensive but also deeply worrisome.

This.

It's MTV, what do you expect...

So what I'm getting out of this is that a movie filmed with the alexa 65 and presented in imax laser will have a higher resolution than a movie filmed with imax film cameras and presented in imax 70mm ?, im just giving an example, that's what I get from what you said. :? You need to define 'resolut...

No, because that has been done before. Its due to how its processed and mastered.