lcbaseball22 wrote:Nah, Kubrick is alright but Hitchcock was far better. I'm a fan of classics, just not 2001 It was abstract bullshit and style over substance.

Read the book. Nothing about that movie was "abstract bullshit." It all had a purpose. I'm willing to answer any questions if you have any.

I still don't get the space shots. They looks BRILLIANT but whats with the bubble? If its a spoiler then try to be vague as hell Haven't read the script so my best guess is that since it's a wormhole it's distorting the space and light around it causing it to appear like that. Pretty sure that's wh...

Rsionis wrote:

is it the same jacket in all of these ?

Can anyone who has seen Godzilla in IMAX confirm whether or not the Interstellar trailer is attached?

Panapaok wrote:

davids wrote:

I'm counting on a scene like this happening.

A little over 90 minutes.

m4st4 wrote:

Picklen wrote:This place is going to be packed tomorrow afternoon isn't it?

It's going to be a party, yes.

What's the source of that gif?

Picklen wrote:This place is going to be packed tomorrow afternoon isn't it?

Correct. Plenty to discuss.

I've somehow not watched it yet. Glad it's going to pay off when I see it tonight. Answer this, does it look better than Inception (visually, story, characters) from what we're given? Visuals look to be better than Inception's, thought that shouldn't be surprising given the nature of this film. Bot...

^ And what's great in this what I just described is that it's a very, very realistic depiction of the Universe and objects in Universe. And I just love that they are going for a realistic sci-fi. (after all, the whole film is based on real theories of physics) Crossing my fingers for no sound in sp...