If it asks for a PW, I would probably try something ftom the 3rd document ... 98H1 or FO439 ...

Aranion wrote:

Alex wrote:There's nothing in the Wired article about a new document ... and even if it were - another one has popped up already on empireonline.

Link, please?

And man, I hope this is the beginning of something ongoing, not just a flash like the Bane image reveal.

Were talking about this article, right?

There's nothing in the Wired article about a new document ... and even if it were - another one has popped up already on empireonline.

m4st4 wrote:

Alex wrote:
Who is talking about a pic up in 24 hrs?

We get a pic, who said that? I think they meant another document, by midnight or something.

Who is "they"?

Notrip22 wrote:they are talking about a pic up in 24 hours?

Who is talking about a pic up in 24 hrs?

LOL ... thanks for acknowledging my point, tykjen

Aha ... so it is not about the way he keeps questioning whether people are really not bothered? Really. REALLY? SERIOUSLY? He used actor abc in x out of y movies ... that doesn't bother you? What if he reused the same cast for the next 3 movies? The next 5? The rest of his life? Really? REALLY? You ...

... and I personally think there's nothing wrong with that. Nothing wrong with funny movies and good entertainment.

But I also do fear that it will come out awful, thanks to McG.

Sorry, but it IS a dead horse since the same opinions are repeated over and over since page 1.

Skyab just cannot believe that there are people who are not bothered by the same things that he is. That is all this thread is about.