I said not a Movie per se. It looks more like a calculated business decision than a movie, to me.

You think Smurfs 3D will be a worthy price of american cinema? Or did you work on the movie and are offended or something? OR, are you just trolling?

Pick one please.

They're not really making "movies" per se.
The Smurfs Movie was never intended as a piece of art, it's an entertainment product, conceived as safe & generic to reach the broadest audience, so it can be mass marketed to fuel the waning film industry.

Just my two cents.

Btw good photo's Crazy Eight.

Kids don't go to shit movies by themselves.

allstarr55js wrote:

prince0gotham wrote:yeah thanks for wasting our time without even making us laugh at this so called joke

You do not have to read or respond to what I say so your wasting your own time.

Not true, As prestigious members of the internet it is our duty to take down trolls when and wherever possible.

When you add the dates of 9/11 & The Earthquake in Japan (excluding the first two digits of the year), it adds up to 2012. It's just a coincidence.

That can't be an excuse if you said you could take a better photo with a disposable camera.

EDIT: You're right prince0gotham. Man, I should be able to pick up on this shit by now!

IWatchFilmsNotMovies wrote:

chee wrote:I don't see anything on his IMDb about Aquaman.

That's odd. I've seen the film and i'm sure basically everyone has seen it except you.

A: Not everyone pays an extra 20$ a month for HBO.
B: Even if you have HBO, not everyone wants to see Entourage.

chee wrote:

solo2001 wrote: I had to look it up, he starred as himself in Entourage.

But what does that have to do with Aquaman?

And made the movie within the Entourage universe. I've never heard if it either.