Search found 56 matches
I thought he looked the part in Inception. I thought he was a more charismatic Bond in Inception, than Daniel Craig in Casino Royale, now that I think about it. Craigs Bond isn't really charismatic anyway... just somewhat. It's much more real. I doubt a spy would want to make a lasting impression o...
Looks like it'll atleast be entertaining, but is it me or did they just use the same elements from the first one? (missing person, wild animal in their hotel room, tattoo in place of the missing tooth). Best part is the Asian gangster randomly being there and having that obnoxious laugh.
RomanM wrote:I don't know if Hardy is the best choice aesthetically. I'm sure he could act the part though.
I thought he looked the part in Inception. I thought he was a more charismatic Bond in Inception, than Daniel Craig in Casino Royale, now that I think about it.
fassbender and hardy are obviously the two top choices for a new Bond. Cavill is a bit too clean. He doesn't have that devilish characteristic, the naughtiness that is so necessary to play Bond. Cavill is too clean. Squeaky clean. That's why he's Clark Kent.
from Alex Billington of firstshowing.net who attended an early screening- Warrior was incredible, better than The Fighter. Tom Hardy gives a phenomenal, Oscar-level performance. Best movie I've seen in 2011 so far. :modesty: interesting because I think somebody else was saying that in this thread. ...