I don't really care tbh, like whatever. Too cool for this shit anyway

Art Decider wrote: ↑

February 7th, 2020, 1:54 pm

Not art

I beg your pardon?

My dear friend Sam told me he's flirting with the idea of directing his own amateur porno next, so I think I'll lens that one next, trying to give it a real cinematic look and feel and creating a truly immersive sexperience. Maybe I'll do a quick cumeo, idk

Nicolaslabra wrote: ↑

December 19th, 2019, 10:00 pm

raimibonn wrote: ↑

December 19th, 2019, 8:52 pm

Overrated? Hahah tell that to Roger Deakins

Hey man, i know my Roger deakins lol, but i never find Roger going for "the beauty shots", or gratuitous camera movements, the beauty of his work lies in other places.

Thanks, man. I appreciate it.

Rubbish cinematography. Skyfall was the last Bond film where the camera really captured the essence of the thematic elements at hand and where colour contributed to the film's distinctive character and identity. Everyone should see that one instead.

I hate these lies about single-take movies. 1917 is not one long take. Why do they think we'll believe that over and over? If something like that were actually achievable, Mendes wouldn't be the first one to do it. It would've been Kubrick or Hitchcock or Malick or, you know, one of the greats. u w...

I hate these lies about single-take movies. 1917 is not one long take. Why do they think we'll believe that over and over? If something like that were actually achievable, Mendes wouldn't be the first one to do it. It would've been Kubrick or Hitchcock or Malick or, you know, one of the greats. u w...