dafox wrote:RIFA wrote:Talking from one single perspective means you can't really participate in a debate fairly so what's the point of others debating with you in the first place?
We've had this thing once and you ended up hiding behind the same "argument" (cuz it's hard to call it that) over and over again while obviously being proven wrong.
There's just no sense in talking about this subject anymore. It takes a long time and it leads to nothing when people have one-way of seeing things and they're not opened at all to different perspectives.
Are you talking to me or Chom?
We've had this thing once and you ended up hiding behind the same "argument" (cuz it's hard to call it that) over and over again while obviously being proven wrong.
After a second look I'm convinced you're at least partially talking to me. This is very amusing if thats the case because you'd be doing the same thing you did in our last argument. You don't acknowledge most if not all the points I made and then say you proved me wrong. I just said something on the crimes of the 20th century for the first time in this thread and you say you've already proven me wrong on it "over and over again" thus showing your lie and or lack of perception.
