ComptonTerry wrote:Batfan175 wrote:
i'm sorry but I interpreted the words "there had better be something" as "there had better be something or else...", which sounds like making demands but if I misread it i'm sorry.
Meaning, Nolan usually doesn't have good female characters. Usually not very attractive, at least in his Batman films. So, for that reason nothing was meant to be sexualized... but this is Catwoman. I think stating Catwoman needs to be overtly sexualized (but not in the sense that she is just a sex symbol, she is much more, but like it or not that is a part of her overall appeal.) is stating the obvious. I want to see Nolan do that for once. Non of his movies have ever even reached the limits of PG13 in that sense.
Interpret that however you wish.
Just because you want that to happen does not mean it's going t happen. Better be cautious and wait for the film to come out before you get your expectations too high...you might find Nolan's films to be devoid of sexual tension (except Memento). I also think sexualizing catwoman is denying her the ability to become a real character beyond the fetish. So as long as there's flirting with sexual undertones that's fine by me. If she starts taking her clothes off it's just gonna sit awkwardly with the rest of this very serious film.
Tehehe