Loading...
NF: Nolan Fans
The 2012 grand-scale epic about Batman's struggle to overcome the terrorist leader Bane, as well as his own inner demons.

Joseph Gordon-Levitt as John Blake

Posts: 18356
Allstar wrote:Oldman was boring in Tinker.


What? No. It's fair enough calling the character or the film boring, which I don't think it is, but the performance isn't boring at all.
Posts: 26590
Mason wrote:
Allstar wrote:Oldman was boring in Tinker.


What? No. It's fair enough calling the character or the film boring, which I don't think it is, but the performance isn't boring at all.

Yeah you're right. However I still definitely was not overly impressed.
Posts: 18356
Allstar wrote:
Mason wrote:
What? No. It's fair enough calling the character or the film boring, which I don't think it is, but the performance isn't boring at all.

Yeah you're right. However I still definitely was not overly impressed.


I definitely think Oldman deserves his Oscar for this. I also think he is the strongest actor in the line-up, but I have a feeling Pitt will get it for some reason.
Posts: 26590
Mason wrote:
Allstar wrote:Yeah you're right. However I still definitely was not overly impressed.


I definitely think Oldman deserves his Oscar for this. I also think he is the strongest actor in the line-up, but I have a feeling Pitt will get it for some reason.

It's Clooney or Jean I think.
Posts: 2659
IMO if we're just basing it on the performance that they were nominated for then Dujardin or Bichir should win. Also, Shannon and Harrelson were robbed of a nomination.
Posts: 2606
Allstar wrote:Oldman was boring in Tinker. Also can't compare Smiley and Arthur in any way shape or form.


It was subtle, not boring. There's a difference.
Posts: 4697
Location: Arlington, Virginia
Jean'll take the Oscar.
Posts: 3537
EnzoTheBaker wrote:
Allstar wrote:Oldman was boring in Tinker. Also can't compare Smiley and Arthur in any way shape or form.


It was subtle, not boring. There's a difference.


There's a difference, but Oldman was both.
Posts: 19038
Location: Croatia
Wait... Oldman was ''boring'' in Tinker? :eh: He was interesting, tonally adapted to the whole grey/anemic structure of the entire plot, I wouldn't say he bored me, he was interesting, just not enough.
Posts: 9460
Location: The Ashes of Gotham
m4st4 wrote:Wait... Oldman was ''boring'' in Tinker? :eh: He was interesting, tonally adapted to the whole grey/anemic structure of the entire plot, I wouldn't say he bored me, he was interesting, just not enough.

His character was boring, but his performance made it more interesting.
← Previous page Next page →
← Return to The Dark Knight Rises
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests.