Page 1 of 2

Budget?

Posted: November 5th, 2012, 1:53 am
by Dodd
Anyone know how much this film was made for?

Budget?

Posted: November 5th, 2012, 2:22 am
by apw
£3,000

Budget?

Posted: November 5th, 2012, 2:42 am
by Dodd
apw wrote:£3,000
source code?

Budget?

Posted: November 5th, 2012, 3:03 am
by apw
Dodd wrote:
apw wrote:£3,000
source code?
Christopher Nolan

Budget?

Posted: November 5th, 2012, 3:26 pm
by Dodd
thanks

Budget?

Posted: November 12th, 2012, 9:26 am
by Cop 223
Christopher Nolan, what a man. From the lowest budgets to some of the biggest in the world.

Budget?

Posted: December 19th, 2012, 7:40 pm
by m4st4
apw wrote:£3,000
Wow, that's impressive.

Budget?

Posted: December 30th, 2012, 9:52 am
by didich
:clap: :clap: I'm 'dissecting' the film, scene by scene, for a project of mine. An amazing experience so far to see wqhat one can do without a budget.

Budget?

Posted: April 15th, 2013, 5:20 pm
by Will Jacobs
He shot it on an Arriflex 16BL and some other 16mm Bolex camera. Very impressive work indeed. I plan on shooting an extremely low budget 16mm film myself.

Budget?

Posted: May 13th, 2013, 11:50 pm
by Lenny!
I heard that Aronofsky shot "Pi" on 16mm tri-ex REVERSAL film stock, which means there's no negative -- you're stuck with that one copy of the film, so if it scratches or tears, you're screwed. But the grainy look of that reversal stock looks better than the negative stock, thus the film looks great.

Let's hope more filmmakers listen to Nolan's call to use film, not digital. And not just the big Hollywood filmmakers, but indie directors, too.