Nolan Fans

Discussion forums for the premiere fan community for and by fans of film director Christopher Nolan.
http://www.nolanfans.com/forums/

Behind the scenes - Set Photos/Videos (Potential Spoilers)

http://www.nolanfans.com/forums/viewtopic.php?f=46&t=41966

Page 53 of 147

Re: Set Photos/Videos (Potential Spoilers)

Posted: July 21st, 2019, 2:25 pm
by ANONIMNIQ
If they get 2 extra days, next week is the last time they filming in Tallinn, right?

Re: Set Photos/Videos (Potential Spoilers)

Posted: July 21st, 2019, 2:43 pm
by Willem
Why is the car in the background moving in reverse? With the explosion in the foreground... This film is so weird

Like I get the other scenes with the car driving normally through the reversing cars, but I don’t understand this lol

Re: Set Photos/Videos (Potential Spoilers)

Posted: July 21st, 2019, 2:43 pm
by Nolan62
AhmadAli95 wrote: ↑
July 21st, 2019, 7:00 am
 I really don't think it's about time travel - or maybe I'm just hoping it's not about time travel.
I want time manipulation to be in the script and in the editing as in non-linear storytelling, something he's been experimenting with since the beginning.
Yes, I follow you on that point, again I don't think this new project involves sci-fi/fantasy elements.
Nolan will experimente some kind of new stuffs with the idea of time, like he did with Dunkirk I think.

And can we stop with this Inception-related rumors again, I though it was finished, it's a completely original new project we'll know that now, it's almost sure.

Re: Set Photos/Videos (Potential Spoilers)

Posted: July 21st, 2019, 2:47 pm
by radewart
Is the actor in this picture wearing something on his face?
It kinda looks like it, hard to tell.

Re: Set Photos/Videos (Potential Spoilers)

Posted: July 21st, 2019, 2:55 pm
by Nolan62
radewart wrote: ↑
July 21st, 2019, 2:47 pm
Is the actor in this picture wearing something on his face?
It kinda looks like it, hard to tell.
Yes, I was about to talk about it ;) It looks like some kind of oxygen mask.

Nolan, WHAT ARE YOU DOING ?

Re: Set Photos/Videos (Potential Spoilers)

Posted: July 21st, 2019, 3:00 pm
by ANONIMNIQ
I think these are new here:

Re: Set Photos/Videos (Potential Spoilers)

Posted: July 21st, 2019, 3:03 pm
by ANONIMNIQ
Willem wrote: ↑
July 21st, 2019, 2:43 pm
Why is the car in the background moving in reverse? With the explosion in the foreground... This film is so weird

Like I get the other scenes with the car driving normally through the reversing cars, but I don’t understand this lol
It's because this is obviously important for the background of the scene.

Re: Set Photos/Videos (Potential Spoilers)

Posted: July 21st, 2019, 3:37 pm
by Geoffrey
Ruth wrote: ↑
July 21st, 2019, 1:38 pm
 Please refrain from using able-ist language here. Autism, or any kind of mental/intellectual disorder, isn’t funny or edgy to be used in such context.
lolsgame wrote: ↑
July 21st, 2019, 11:49 am
Where do you draw the line? Saying something is "stupid", "idiotic", "moronic", "maniacal", "lunatic", "insane", "slow", "psychotic", &c., is ableist too. Most people would have no objection to that language even though it is more or just as likely to affect those who fit for those descriptions. Someone may not be "mentally handicapped" and instead just above an abritrary line on the spectrum of intelligence. Why is it acceptable to describe things as "stupid", what somebody with an IQ of 80 would be, but not with a more socially taboo word that applies to a lower echelon of IQ scorers?

Re: Set Photos/Videos (Potential Spoilers)

Posted: July 21st, 2019, 4:27 pm
by Ruth
Geoffrey wrote: ↑
July 21st, 2019, 3:37 pm
Ruth wrote: ↑
July 21st, 2019, 1:38 pm
 Please refrain from using able-ist language here. Autism, or any kind of mental/intellectual disorder, isn’t funny or edgy to be used in such context.
lolsgame wrote: ↑
July 21st, 2019, 11:49 am
Where do you draw the line? Saying something is "stupid", "idiotic", "moronic", "maniacal", "lunatic", "insane", "slow", "psychotic", &c., is ableist too. Most people would have no objection to that language even though it is more or just as likely to affect those who fit for those descriptions. Someone may not be "mentally handicapped" and instead just above an abritrary line on the spectrum of intelligence. Why is it acceptable to describe things as "stupid", what somebody with an IQ of 80 would be, but not with a more socially taboo word that applies to a lower echelon of IQ scorers?
I’m not single-handedly drawing the lines here, it was a reported post.

Re: Set Photos/Videos (Potential Spoilers)

Posted: July 21st, 2019, 5:54 pm
by Disney+'s solo2001
just foe him
All times are UTC-04:00
Page 53 of 147

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Limited