I know this argument might be futile, but I'd like to react to some of the claims.
The Avengers series grossed many times Nolan's career in just seven years. - Why would anyone compare the whole Avengers universe and its BO performance to Nolan's BO power? Why does this matter? What does this prove? That the most popular blockbuster franchise (including 20+ films over the span of more than 10 years) brought in more money than the filmography of Christopher Nolan? What's the relevance of this?
Avatar (original movie) grossed over $2B. - Once again, so what? I still don't know why this is relevant.
I can't even imagine Nolan making an original movie that crosses $2B. - No one can and no one demands Nolan to do that.
Nolan struggled to meet studio execs expecations back in 2012 with a franchise movie. - Didn't TDKR gross almost the same as TDK? It went over a billion dollars, I'm sure. Or you mean Nolan didn't meet the expectations because it didn't go over $2 billion?
And one more thing : A significant percentage of Nolan fans are under 18. He can't pull off a Box office victory with an adult movie. He is limited to PG13. - What?? Under 18? Where do you get this from? And he is "LIMITED" to PG13? So how does this argument hold up when it comes to the famously R-rated Avengers franchise? How does PG13 limit your box office success? Or am I misunderstanding something here?
He didn't include a Got Talent star in Dunkirk because he was great actor. That guy had never acted in a feature film. Twas a financial decision. - No.
The Avengers series grossed many times Nolan's career in just seven years. - Why would anyone compare the whole Avengers universe and its BO performance to Nolan's BO power? Why does this matter? What does this prove? That the most popular blockbuster franchise (including 20+ films over the span of more than 10 years) brought in more money than the filmography of Christopher Nolan? What's the relevance of this?
Avatar (original movie) grossed over $2B. - Once again, so what? I still don't know why this is relevant.
I can't even imagine Nolan making an original movie that crosses $2B. - No one can and no one demands Nolan to do that.
Nolan struggled to meet studio execs expecations back in 2012 with a franchise movie. - Didn't TDKR gross almost the same as TDK? It went over a billion dollars, I'm sure. Or you mean Nolan didn't meet the expectations because it didn't go over $2 billion?
And one more thing : A significant percentage of Nolan fans are under 18. He can't pull off a Box office victory with an adult movie. He is limited to PG13. - What?? Under 18? Where do you get this from? And he is "LIMITED" to PG13? So how does this argument hold up when it comes to the famously R-rated Avengers franchise? How does PG13 limit your box office success? Or am I misunderstanding something here?
He didn't include a Got Talent star in Dunkirk because he was great actor. That guy had never acted in a feature film. Twas a financial decision. - No.