Thanks for suggesting this. Awesome.The Special One wrote: ↑January 8th, 2020, 3:51 amQuentin Tarantino on What Makes ‘Dunkirk’ a Masterpiece
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JpJK4MUAMDM
TENET - General Information
Posts: 5
Joined:
January 2020
Posts: 4193
Joined:
June 2010
Posts: 4193
Joined:
June 2010
great 1st post. That would make a lot of sense, you would think JDW and Pattinson would need a reason to travel to India and Italy and so forth.mrticktac wrote: ↑January 8th, 2020, 8:43 amHi all Nolan fans, this is my first post but I've been reading the forum since the shooting began. Like most of you I can't wait for the movie and it's so nice to read all your theories, speculations etc.
I wanted to share some of my thoughts. I'm gonna make it as a spoiler just in case.
There, I'm curious what you think about that, especially the article from the website.
but did you notice that when they're in the van in the prologue, when JDW wakes up, it starts to rain, you can clearly see it on the windscreen. Probably a total coincidence or maybe just a good visual, but maybe something to do with water (probably not 
)
Posts: 5
Joined:
January 2020
Ha! So, I'm not the only one that noticed the Pattinson hair discrepancy! Nice. Thanks for sharing.
Posts: 19
Joined:
November 2019
Regardless how the movie turns out to be we know that at the very least there is going to be spectacular visuals and one or two epic action sequences like the inception hallway fight or intersteller docking scene etc
Last edited by Nomis on January 9th, 2020, 10:17 am, edited 1 time in total.
Reason: use spoiler tags
Reason: use spoiler tags
I think anyone that has watched Pattinson for more than two minutes knows that he constantly runs his hands through his hair. It must drive the hair and makeup team crazy. I'm guessing he did so and in editing two different takes the continuity error shows up. So either the scripty had a bad day or they decided to use that take for other reasons despite the (minor) continuity error.Nadatotem wrote: ↑January 8th, 2020, 6:27 pmI believe everything is intentional. The perspective changes, his position changes, and his hair does literally change. That's not a matter of brushing your hair aside. It wouldn't go from "Ken Doll" perfect to messy. But I admit...maybe nitpicking...but also maybe it's a time travel/alternate reality situation. Something to ponder.
I don't think this is a clue for anything.
Posts: 177
Joined:
December 2019
lol we're going crazy!!Nadatotem wrote: ↑January 8th, 2020, 6:27 pmI believe everything is intentional. The perspective changes, his position changes, and his hair does literally change. That's not a matter of brushing your hair aside. It wouldn't go from "Ken Doll" perfect to messy. But I admit...maybe nitpicking...but also maybe it's a time travel/alternate reality situation. Something to ponder.speedy117 wrote: ↑January 8th, 2020, 8:25 amI’m not OP but in this case it’s not a matter of perspective, his hair quite literally does change. Though, I don’t think it means anything.gropercity wrote: ↑January 8th, 2020, 6:22 am
Wow you're over analyzing things. One shot is from the side and one is head on. There is absolutely no issue with it. Side profile and head on are two completely different perspectives. You're essentially saying a person's hair doesn't look the same from the side as it does in the front. No shit.
Posts: 177
Joined:
December 2019
Agreed, but I like the speculation because Nolan really does make us think about every single element and nuance in his films.senseandsarcasm wrote: ↑January 9th, 2020, 2:21 pmI think anyone that has watched Pattinson for more than two minutes knows that he constantly runs his hands through his hair. It must drive the hair and makeup team crazy. I'm guessing he did so and in editing two different takes the continuity error shows up. So either the scripty had a bad day or they decided to use that take for other reasons despite the (minor) continuity error.Nadatotem wrote: ↑January 8th, 2020, 6:27 pmI believe everything is intentional. The perspective changes, his position changes, and his hair does literally change. That's not a matter of brushing your hair aside. It wouldn't go from "Ken Doll" perfect to messy. But I admit...maybe nitpicking...but also maybe it's a time travel/alternate reality situation. Something to ponder.
I don't think this is a clue for anything.
Also in the first shot Pattinson's hand is pointing on the bullet hole while in the second his hand is clearly down...so there was more footage in between which will be in the final cut...me might have simply touched the glass with bullet hole and than his hand went straight to his hair like alwaysrotas wrote: ↑January 9th, 2020, 5:59 pmAgreed, but I like the speculation because Nolan really does make us think about every single element and nuance in his films.senseandsarcasm wrote: ↑January 9th, 2020, 2:21 pmI think anyone that has watched Pattinson for more than two minutes knows that he constantly runs his hands through his hair. It must drive the hair and makeup team crazy. I'm guessing he did so and in editing two different takes the continuity error shows up. So either the scripty had a bad day or they decided to use that take for other reasons despite the (minor) continuity error.Nadatotem wrote: ↑January 8th, 2020, 6:27 pmI believe everything is intentional. The perspective changes, his position changes, and his hair does literally change. That's not a matter of brushing your hair aside. It wouldn't go from "Ken Doll" perfect to messy. But I admit...maybe nitpicking...but also maybe it's a time travel/alternate reality situation. Something to ponder.
I don't think this is a clue for anything.
