Page 16 of 17
Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews
Posted: July 31st, 2017, 5:56 pm
by dormouse7
Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews
Posted: July 31st, 2017, 6:04 pm
by dormouse7
Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews
Posted: July 31st, 2017, 8:42 pm
by dormouse7
Washington Post
Mixed? (he admired the film but had issues)
https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions ... dc2721257c
Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews
Posted: August 1st, 2017, 8:25 am
by dormouse7
Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews
Posted: August 1st, 2017, 8:30 am
by dormouse7
Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews
Posted: August 1st, 2017, 10:11 am
by ShahrokhSam
Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews
Posted: August 1st, 2017, 10:44 pm
by dormouse7
Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews
Posted: August 2nd, 2017, 4:52 pm
by dormouse7
A Pakistan reviewer
The Express Tribune
Dunkirk review: A not-so-Nolan masterpiece
4/5
https://tribune.com.pk/story/1472339/du ... sterpiece/
Where the documented number of Indian soldiers who participated in the extraction from Dunkirk was not more than four companies, the film has a lot more to offer. If, for once, viewed from a non-Brexiteer perspective you’ll realise the magic that Nolan has created just by focusing on the three essentials of cinema – cinematography, editing and sound design.
Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews
Posted: August 2nd, 2017, 8:01 pm
by dormouse7
Filmspace (includes spoilers, ending explanations)
94%
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DmG2jxaCOAg
Re: Dunkirk Official Reviews
Posted: August 2nd, 2017, 10:36 pm
by Oku
VIDEO