Seeing it in non-1.43:1 didn't diminish the experience?antovolk wrote:Gonna write fuller thoughts up in a bit but: as good as I hoped it would be. Nolan at his most experimental and stripped back since MEMENTO. Dying to see it again in IMAX...next Friday morning , full 1570!
Dunkirk Nolan Fans Member Reviews (NFometer)
not at all, but 1.43:1 will benefit it I'm sure, lots of moment where I felt like WOW that would be amazing in IMAX. If I saw 1.43 first then I'd think lesser of this version probablyokungnyo wrote:Seeing it in non-1.43:1 didn't diminish the experience?antovolk wrote:Gonna write fuller thoughts up in a bit but: as good as I hoped it would be. Nolan at his most experimental and stripped back since MEMENTO. Dying to see it again in IMAX...next Friday morning , full 1570!
It was 70 mm after all, so the impact must still have been fairly great.
It wouldn't have been if it had been a regular digital screen, I assume.
It wouldn't have been if it had been a regular digital screen, I assume.
How would you rank it among other Nolan movies, Ant? And here's something not usually asked of people who enjoyed something: what's its biggest flaw?
EMBARGOED UNTIL TOMORROW NIGHT
Last edited by antovolk on July 16th, 2017, 3:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
So five minutes of the prologue = 15 minutes in the actual film?
And:
And:
EMBARGOED UNTIL TOMORROW NIGHT
Last edited by antovolk on July 16th, 2017, 3:25 am, edited 1 time in total.
lol
So five minutes of the prologue = eight minutes in the actual film?antovolk wrote:I meant - the sequence in the film that the prologue is based around off is 15 minutes into the film.
All I want to know is... does it start with a bang?