Not a fan of that title - had they positioned it somewhere else it might have looked better, but where it is now just doesn't work. Other than that though, the remainder of the poster isn't bad, but it's not good either. Willem has done a better job at marketing the film (in terms of posters) than WB have.

User of Interest wrote:

okungnyo wrote:

User of Interest wrote:*Richtofen style*
So beautiful! Such joy!

What is 'Richtofen style'?

I based it on this voice by Nolan North (especially 1:25):

Thanks, I missed your reply and only just noticed it.

And yeah, as has already been said, it's weird that Mr. Nolan's name is tiny and barely legible.

That's the most important selling point that this film has!

The banner one looks good. The other picture, not so much.

dormouse7 wrote:IMO too much Fionn. And it's a scene they have used over and over. The only new thing is the odd red streaks and dots.

I'd prefer any kind of overview action scene.

He looks like he's smiling

User of Interest wrote:Just uploaded on the Facebook-page:

I'm new to the forum I'm from India, I'm a huge fan of Nolan n his works, Nd what is name of this Facebook page??

Is this new banner and poster official? Because it SUCKS! It's worse than the last Rises poster which was also pretty terrible.

User of Interest wrote:Just uploaded on the Facebook-page:

Soldier on the right is the same as the one second from left haha

Willem wrote:Soldier on the right is the same as the one second from left haha

it's even worse than we all thought

ChristMAX wrote:

Willem wrote:Soldier on the right is the same as the one second from left haha

it's even worse than we all thought

Ah well, it's just an expended version of the poster meant as social media banner

...or will it be used as billboard too?

tommyjon400 wrote:Is this new banner and poster official? Because it SUCKS! It's worse than the last Rises poster which was also pretty terrible.

Stop overreacting, it's not that bad.