Re-upload it!!MuffinMcFluffin wrote:It was for my last year's class on my math channel. I have since removed it since it wasn't pertaining to math and that school year is over, but since my students were subscribed to it that's what I made it on.Oku wrote:Sorry...I made the joke because I thought that it was common knowledge that motion interpolation is widely hated.
Link to the YouTube video?
DVD/Blu-ray Release
I might. It's on my camera I use for softball videos and we're already in-preseason so that's with my equipment, so the next time I have a chance to grab the SD card I might privately upload it for you guys.Oku wrote:Re-upload it!!
Anyway, great HT moment for me during the opening scene. This is how much my house shakes when the first bullets penetrate the fence. This game is called Watch the Clock (slowed to 25% original speed).
And yes, I used the original Blu-ray for this footage for the FB crowd to enjoy the 1.78:1 look.
Oh, and look at that beautiful filmic flicker from 23.976 FPS motion.
Posts: 270
Joined:
July 2017
I know what you mean, my tactile bass transducer nearly overheats 10 minutes into Dunkirk every time I watch it, and it never gets that hot otherwise.MuffinMcFluffin wrote:I might. It's on my camera I use for softball videos and we're already in-preseason so that's with my equipment, so the next time I have a chance to grab the SD card I might privately upload it for you guys.Oku wrote:Re-upload it!!
Anyway, great HT moment for me during the opening scene. This is how much my house shakes when the first bullets penetrate the fence. This game is called Watch the Clock (slowed to 25% original speed).
What is HT?MuffinMcFluffin wrote:I might. It's on my camera I use for softball videos and we're already in-preseason so that's with my equipment, so the next time I have a chance to grab the SD card I might privately upload it for you guys.Oku wrote:Re-upload it!!
Anyway, great HT moment for me during the opening scene. This is how much my house shakes when the first bullets penetrate the fence. This game is called Watch the Clock (slowed to 25% original speed).
And yes, I used the original Blu-ray for this footage for the FB crowd to enjoy the 1.78:1 look.
Oh, and look at that beautiful filmic flicker from 23.976 FPS motion.
Didn't you share this with us already?? I remember your bringing up that clock too.
What do you mean "for the FB crowd to enjoy the 1.78:1 look"?
And what do you mean "beautiful filmic flicker from 23.976 FPS motion"?
HT = home theaterOku wrote:What is HT?
Didn't you share this with us already?? I remember your bringing up that clock too.
What do you mean "for the FB crowd to enjoy the 1.78:1 look"?
And what do you mean "beautiful filmic flicker from 23.976 FPS motion"?
I shared one for War of the Worlds. This one is different.
I think if I used my 2.20:1 cropped Blu-ray, it wouldn't have had the same visual impact with the clock. It's just a small thing. For good measure, yes I would prefer seeing the 1.78:1 IMAX shots than 2.20:1... if they did not change aspect ratios the rest of the way. Because it changes, I'd rather stick with the other version. But for just one shot and no changes? Let's go big, baby!
I recorded this at 60 FPS with my camera and slowed it down, which means it will capture every flicker on my television that it can. With Nolan shooting on film, it shows up as a more prevalent thing than than ever. Basically, if I recorded this with 120 FPS, I wouldn't get any of that flicker. It would just show image, and that's not very film-like to me.
no ht = hot topic don't lie to the usersMuffinMcFluffin wrote:HT = home theaterOku wrote:What is HT?
Didn't you share this with us already?? I remember your bringing up that clock too.
What do you mean "for the FB crowd to enjoy the 1.78:1 look"?
And what do you mean "beautiful filmic flicker from 23.976 FPS motion"?
nelson season 2 wrote:no ht = hot topic don't lie to the usersMuffinMcFluffin wrote:HT = home theaterOku wrote:What is HT?
Didn't you share this with us already?? I remember your bringing up that clock too.
What do you mean "for the FB crowd to enjoy the 1.78:1 look"?
And what do you mean "beautiful filmic flicker from 23.976 FPS motion"?
Finally sitting down to watch the special features on the Blu-Ray. So impressive! Really interesting how they pulled off all these things.
The special features were disappointing. Only two hours and they focused more on the "Dunkirk spirit" and less on the music than I would've liked. They also totally fail to show anything regarding Zimmer's scrapped score which would have been extremely interesting to see.
I see, thanks.MuffinMcFluffin wrote:HT = home theaterOku wrote:What is HT?
Didn't you share this with us already?? I remember your bringing up that clock too.
What do you mean "for the FB crowd to enjoy the 1.78:1 look"?
And what do you mean "beautiful filmic flicker from 23.976 FPS motion"?
I shared one for War of the Worlds. This one is different.
I think if I used my 2.20:1 cropped Blu-ray, it wouldn't have had the same visual impact with the clock. It's just a small thing. For good measure, yes I would prefer seeing the 1.78:1 IMAX shots than 2.20:1... if they did not change aspect ratios the rest of the way. Because it changes, I'd rather stick with the other version. But for just one shot and no changes? Let's go big, baby!
I recorded this at 60 FPS with my camera and slowed it down, which means it will capture every flicker on my television that it can. With Nolan shooting on film, it shows up as a more prevalent thing than than ever. Basically, if I recorded this with 120 FPS, I wouldn't get any of that flicker. It would just show image, and that's not very film-like to me.
I have to agree that it was a bit too fluffy and sanitized.Geoffrey wrote:The special features were disappointing. Only two hours and they focused more on the "Dunkirk spirit" and less on the music than I would've liked. They also totally fail to show anything regarding Zimmer's scrapped score which would have been extremely interesting to see.
A glimpse into the scrapped score would have been great.