Page 4 of 163

Re: 'Interstellar' Reviews Discussion

Posted: October 27th, 2014, 10:52 am
by hasanahmad
Rule of thumb. if a movie gets a rotten review within the first 10 review. it ends up being a badly reviewed movie

Re: 'Interstellar' Reviews Discussion

Posted: October 27th, 2014, 10:54 am
by lcbaseball22
bootsy wrote: first review and its rotten

David Poland: the last act is, easily, the best part of the film. 40 minutes less movie might have made it all seem worth the journey.
OMG a rotten review. I thought the movie would have no rotten reviews. Are you kidding me man just stop.
Well it is kinda depressing for the first one to be rotten; I doubt anyone expected there wouldn't be a single one, but that's a bad start...

hasanamad, where did you get that quote from Poland? :?

Re: 'Interstellar' Reviews Discussion

Posted: October 27th, 2014, 10:55 am
by hasanahmad
lcbaseball22 wrote:
bootsy wrote: first review and its rotten

David Poland: the last act is, easily, the best part of the film. 40 minutes less movie might have made it all seem worth the journey.
OMG a rotten review. I thought the movie would have no rotten reviews. Are you kidding me man just stop.
Well it is kinda depressing for the first one to be rotten; I doubt anyone expected there wouldn't be a single one, but that's a bad start...

hasanamad, where did you get that quote from Poland? :?
A Mod at Boxoffice forums

Re: 'Interstellar' Reviews Discussion

Posted: October 27th, 2014, 10:56 am
by bootsy
hasanahmad wrote:Rule of thumb. if a movie gets a rotten review within the first 10 review. it ends up being a badly reviewed movie
Not true.

Re: 'Interstellar' Reviews Discussion

Posted: October 27th, 2014, 10:57 am
by hasanahmad
bootsy wrote:
hasanahmad wrote:Rule of thumb. if a movie gets a rotten review within the first 10 review. it ends up being a badly reviewed movie
Not true.
I have following this since the websites inception. its the rule of thumb

Re: 'Interstellar' Reviews Discussion

Posted: October 27th, 2014, 10:57 am
by bootsy
hasanahmad wrote:
bootsy wrote:
hasanahmad wrote:Rule of thumb. if a movie gets a rotten review within the first 10 review. it ends up being a badly reviewed movie
Not true.
I have following this since the websites inception. its the rule of thumb
What you said is still not true.

Re: 'Interstellar' Reviews Discussion

Posted: October 27th, 2014, 10:58 am
by Nauta
hasanahmad wrote:Rule of thumb. if a movie gets a rotten review within the first 10 review. it ends up being a badly reviewed movie
That's just stupid.

Re: 'Interstellar' Reviews Discussion

Posted: October 27th, 2014, 11:00 am
by Juliui
Well, the rotten review morphed into a fresh one...

Re: 'Interstellar' Reviews Discussion

Posted: October 27th, 2014, 11:00 am
by Insomniac
David Ehrlich's review:

http://www.littlewhitelies.co.uk/theatr ... llar-28347

It's very positive.

Some spoilers.

Re: 'Interstellar' Reviews Discussion

Posted: October 27th, 2014, 11:01 am
by lcbaseball22
Has this one been posted yet?

http://screencrush.com/interstellar-review/

I haven't read enough to know if it's positive or not, usually I just look at the introductory and conclusion paragraphs to avoid spoilers...
‘Interstellar’ is a good movie that so desperately wants to be important. That sentence is going to read as churlish, but I do admire ‘Interstellar’ for at least attempting to be something that’s not dumb. There are already too many dumb things we are subjected to on a daily basis. And ‘Interstellar’ is ambitious, even though there are a lot of head-scratching scenes. Yet, there we still are, spinning out of control with the reality that Nolan has created – and it’s only when we stop spinning, when we look at it from afar, that we kind of realize how absurd it all was … even though it leaves us craving a little more.

Read More: 'Interstellar' Review: Christopher Nolan's Absured Reality | http://screencrush.com/interstellar-rev ... ck=tsmclip