I have to agree. Dunkirk is really good (and a masterpiece from a technical point of view), but Interstellar is his masterpiece - so far
And the drone thing is fairly obvious, sorry
Re: Interstellar General Information
Posted: January 3rd, 2018, 6:58 pm
by MuffinMcFluffin
So far, indeed.
ChristMAX wrote:And the drone thing is fairly obvious, sorry
It is really obvious. I just don't know why I never drew that connection. I guess because it separates itself from the rest of the film by a couple of scenes, and it's not right at their house (whereas the tractors were).
It's probably worse than when my friend just recently texted me: "Holy shit balls, Batman tells Dent he wasn't the only one who lost everything because he lost Rachel too!" I laughed for two minutes straight.
Also, goddamn! 12 times in the cinema!? He definitely beat my 5 times by a landslide.
Re: Interstellar General Information
Posted: December 29th, 2018, 3:25 pm
by Insomniac
I've never noticed this before but why is that Kramer painting from Seinfeld hanging on the set?
Re: Interstellar General Information
Posted: March 1st, 2019, 8:36 am
by Nomis
Oh
My
God
In two weeks
I will see Interstellar
in
70MM!!!!!!!!!
Cannot fucking wait, last time I saw the film was on blu-ray at home and it was August 2016! So two and a half years ago. I think that was the fourth time I saw the film.
It will also be the first time I see a film shot in both 35mm and IMAX on 70mm. The previous films were all either entirely shot on 65mm (Space Odyssey, Lawrence of Arabia, The Hateful Eight) or 35mm (Phantom Thread) or 65mm and IMAX (Dunkirk). So I wonder how the 35mm printed on 70mm holds up against 70mm IMAX.