Yeah, actually, it does.allstarr55js wrote:Looks like something out of Blade Runner.Mason01 wrote:Yeah, it looks really great. Pretty intimidating looking, actually.
[SPOILERS] Production in Los Angeles
Posts: 18329
Joined:
February 2011
I know Nolan has already used 'Blade Runner' as an inspirational tool for 'Batman Begins', but what if he took a method-inspired technique for the Batwing from 'Blade Runner'? Similar to how the rotating-hallway in 'Inception' was n inspiration-technique from '2001: A Space Odyssey'.allstarr55js wrote:Looks like something out of Blade Runner.Mason01 wrote:Yeah, it looks really great. Pretty intimidating looking, actually.
Posts: 199
Joined:
August 2011
Totally. Because all that stuff was done practically. Nolan is inspired by those films because they did things for REAL. CGI wasn't really around then, and therefore they had to do it practically. Nolan is the only working director who does this. And it's GREAT!BlairCo wrote:I know Nolan has already used 'Blade Runner' as an inspirational tool for 'Batman Begins', but what if he took a method-inspired technique for the Batwing from 'Blade Runner'? Similar to how the rotating-hallway in 'Inception' was n inspiration-technique from '2001: A Space Odyssey'.allstarr55js wrote:
Looks like something out of Blade Runner.
BoneronFire wrote:Totally. Because all that stuff was done practically. Nolan is inspired by those films because they did things for REAL. CGI wasn't really around then, and therefore they had to do it practically. Nolan is the only working director who does this. And it's GREAT!BlairCo wrote:
I know Nolan has already used 'Blade Runner' as an inspirational tool for 'Batman Begins', but what if he took a method-inspired technique for the Batwing from 'Blade Runner'? Similar to how the rotating-hallway in 'Inception' was n inspiration-technique from '2001: A Space Odyssey'.
Posts: 199
Joined:
August 2011
??????????? I'm saying Nolan does things practically. How is that being sarcastic????BlairCo wrote:BoneronFire wrote:
Totally. Because all that stuff was done practically. Nolan is inspired by those films because they did things for REAL. CGI wasn't really around then, and therefore they had to do it practically. Nolan is the only working director who does this. And it's GREAT!
That 'Totally' at the beginning looked a bit sarcastic.BoneronFire wrote:??????????? I'm saying Nolan does things practically. How is that being sarcastic????BlairCo wrote:
Posts: 9038
Joined:
July 2010
I think your sarcasm detector is malfunctioning.BlairCo wrote:That 'Totally' at the beginning looked a bit sarcastic.BoneronFire wrote:
??????????? I'm saying Nolan does things practically. How is that being sarcastic????
HOLY MOTHER OF NOLAN!DoubleD wrote:
courtesy of someone over at SHH... I don't get why they're convinced cgi blades are a done deal
Posts: 140
Joined:
May 2011
thats ridiculous, blades under the body? did they think it was gonna double for a lawn mower? besides its already got jet type engines
