Cilogy wrote:
No, I literally give up because you're refusing to see reason.
So when someone says that Gotham was altered to not look like NYC (when it wasn't and thus really did look like NYC) and I point such a fact out, I'm refusing to see reason?
I really don't see what your problem is Cilogy. He's merely upset that footage shot in New York looks like New York. I know how he feels. When I take a picture of a tree and it doesn't come out looking like styrofoam bridge over a river of maple syrup, I'm naturally inclined to be disappointed. I mean, who would have thought that my picture of a tree would look like a tree. Certainly not me.
Crazy Eight wrote:I really don't see what your problem is Cilogy. He's merely upset that footage shot in New York looks like New York. I know how he feels. When I take a picture of a tree and it doesn't come out looking like styrofoam bridge over a river of maple syrup, I'm naturally inclined to be disappointed. I mean, who would have thought that my picture of a tree would look like a tree. Certainly not me.
Crazy Eight wrote:I really don't see what your problem is Cilogy. He's merely upset that footage shot in New York looks like New York. I know how he feels. When I take a picture of a tree and it doesn't come out looking like styrofoam bridge over a river of maple syrup, I'm naturally inclined to be disappointed. I mean, who would have thought that my picture of a tree would look like a tree. Certainly not me.
