To be honest, the really cheapened the character of Bane, IMO.
Bane WAS NOT a pawn
Posts: 6803
Joined:
May 2011
Er, no.Viper wrote:To be honest, thereally cheapened the character of Bane, IMO.
God forbid a character isn't one-dimensional!Viper wrote:To be honest, thereally cheapened the character of Bane, IMO.
This wasn't about dimensions of character, this was taking all the notions you've built up about a character over the past 2 and a half hours, and then completely flushing them down the toilet.solo2001 wrote: God forbid a character isn't one-dimensional!
That's not adding dimensions, that's just bad writing. Period.
Don't get me wrong, I absolutely loved the movie. I wasn't crazy about it on my first viewing (mostly because it violated all of my expectations), but I've seen it five times now and I'm loving it more with each viewing. Those last 20 or so minutes *really* felt like a Batman film, and I absolutely love the imagery of the conclusion...
But that doesn't change the fact that the direction they went with Bane was bad writing.
Hardly. I'm not sure you and I were watching the same movie. The "entire movie" was not spent setting Bane up as completely emotionless, pure evil. The filtered back story, set somewhere between truth and legend, showed the very human side of Bane and helped us understand what was possibly driving his current motivations, violence, etc. Bane was one of the most well-drawn characters in the movie.Viper wrote:To be honest, thereally cheapened the character of Bane, IMO.
My Bane origins saga: http://www.nolanfans.com/forums/viewtop ... 16&t=11993
A child born in hell...who was the only one to crawl out of the pit...excommunicated by ras al ghul for being too extreme...obliterates anyone who dares cross him or screws up his plans...beats batman to a pulp...the list goes on. Everything about his back story alludes to him being pure evil (Daggert even comes right out and says it). I was utterly terrified of him when I first saw the movie. One of the few villains to actually create that feeling in me while watching a movie.Baniac wrote:Hardly. I'm not sure you and I were watching the same movie. The "entire movie" was not spent setting Bane up as completely emotionless, pure evil. The filtered back story, set somewhere between truth and legend, showed the very human side of Bane and helped us understand what was possibly driving his current motivations, violence, etc. Bane was one of the most well-drawn characters in the movie.Viper wrote:To be honest, thereally cheapened the character of Bane, IMO.
Then...Bam! Completely turned on a dime. granted, that's probably an attempt at a twist, but it wasn't a good one IMO.
Wasn't a huge deal, though. It's probably the first real criticism I've had in a Nolan movie.
To me, because of the back story fed to us throughout the film, it wasn't a "complete turn on a dime." In fact, the opposite to me. I would have been more surprised if we hadn't gotten something like what was revealed. *shrugs*Viper wrote:A child born in hell...who was the only one to crawl out of the pit...excommunicated by ras al ghul for being too extreme...obliterates anyone who dares cross him or screws up his plans...beats batman to a pulp...the list goes on. Everything about his back story alludes to him being pure evil (Daggert even comes right out and says it). I was utterly terrified of him when I first saw the movie. One of the few villains to actually create that feeling in me while watching a movie.Baniac wrote:
Hardly. I'm not sure you and I were watching the same movie. The "entire movie" was not spent setting Bane up as completely emotionless, pure evil. The filtered back story, set somewhere between truth and legend, showed the very human side of Bane and helped us understand what was possibly driving his current motivations, violence, etc. Bane was one of the most well-drawn characters in the movie.
Then...Bam! Completely turned on a dime. granted, that's probably an attempt at a twist, but it wasn't a good one IMO.
My Bane origins saga: http://www.nolanfans.com/forums/viewtop ... 16&t=11993
God forbid the twist add depth!
I think it would have been a repeat of the Joker if Bane was kept emotionless. Joker didn't have any serious agenda; he just wanted to see a Chaos-Filled City. With Bane, he always had an agenda, even if Talia was in on it as well. Talia really gave me depth and meaning to Bane and made us actually feel sympathy for this monster that we have come to know.
There's a twist that adds depth...slimshady247 wrote:God forbid the twist add depth!