Loading...
NF: Nolan Fans
The 2012 grand-scale epic about Batman's struggle to overcome the terrorist leader Bane, as well as his own inner demons.

NF Reviews/Reactions Only

Posts: 39
07202012 wrote:
chronos wrote:For me BB=TDK>>TDKR

Altough TDKR is the longest movie of the three.it felt like the shortest when i saw it. Because there is always somethings happen and happens all the time way too fast.So the diologues arent as good as TDK or any nolan film.
I mean in Bruce's funeral. Alfred scene is too short for me to get the sad feel.
or there are no speeches like in TDK when Alfred talks about criminals to Bruce.or Joker's speech to Harvey in the hospital about the society.Or all of the Rasal gul speeches in BB.And that kind of speeches are the best things for me about a Nolan Film.

The scenes like Miranda sleeping with Bruce.They have no past and suddenly they are sleeping together and it gave no emotions as well.You cant get the feel that they are bound together from now on and so Bruce's trust for Miranda seems kinda cheesy and foolish for Batman.
And the movie has got lots of things to tell and the time is just not enough for all of this.

But the story is good and i wish they shot this film in two parts.So they can have more time to tell the story more emotionally.And they can add more dialouges and scenes to tell the characters emotions and pasts etc..


Dunno how I'd feel if I were given The Dark Knight Rises Part One and Part Two... :eh:

I think it would have been superb if this would happen. It really just felt too fast and you know they had to cut the hell out of it. I loved the batman vs bane fights but they were way too short. They should have been marathons. Just my 2 cents.
Posts: 549
Location: None of Ur Business
Hmm....it would have been interesting if WB's and Nolan decided to release TDKRises in two parts like how last Potter was done.

I think that would have been interesting to say the least. I'm surprised WB's didn't try for that to "milk the cash cow" so to speak.

Nolan probably didn't want to that though.
Posts: 310
TDKR - My rate 9.5/10 (That is the highest rate I'v ever given to any film)

Directing : 9.5/10
Writing : 9/10
Cinematography : 10/10
Performance *overall actors/actresses* : 9.5/10
Music : 10/10
Production Design : 9.5/10
Production : 10/10

I'll just say some brief things about my rates .. I'll say what are the BAD things not what is good. as , of course, my rates imply how kind of CINEMA I see in the movie.

********SPOILERS********
Directing - 9.5
- THE FIGHTS > I know we are all enjoyed these fights but they just don't fit to that huge film. I mean, it's the same CUT and IMITATE push-pack fists. WHY?? I felt like Nolan could ask them to make a real fight .. with real fists and bruises. I mean, come'on That movie was deserve more than any usual movie. I don't know why I imagined it like this. They still pretty awesome though.
and batman is supposed to be a NINJA .. I don't know, I didn't feel him like Ninja at all. That was just lame. I don't believe that Nolan did the (bad guys with guns waiting for the good guy to beat them) in that movie -WHILE RESCUING BLAKE SCENE-. Just why?? I don't know.
- NO BRUTALITY > Why Nolan can't give up his PG-13 thing and show us a real BLOOD and NICK-BREAKS things?? That could be awesome. I mean, that is his ballpark .. REALISM! Just why in that part didn't give us the usual-nolanism thing?? I know that was for distributing but, That movie was not about money, it was about sending a message.

Writing - 9/10
Plot HOLES :
- Crippled for 8 years ?? I can't be good with that. even in the worst situations .. people keep their lives with their sadness. and healing his legs that doesn't mean that he will forget rachel or something. That was bad.
- No enough original bane ..
- Bane's death flaw .. That is cinematic art not REAL life. I know of course it's nolan and his realism but, I'ts realistic cinematic art .. after all it's cinema. I just wanted a dramatic end for Bane like what he did for The Joker.

Cinematography - 10/10
Just magnificent. Lightning, camera motion, shots, takes and angles are just PERFECT. I can't find any flaw.

Performances - 9.5
TOPNOTCH acting.. I just felt bad for giving 10/10 in that category .. you know, acting is always has flaws.
NOTE: I think bane is much more interesting character than the joker -Though, I think Heath Ledger's performance is UN EARTHY .. INCREDIBLE and he is my top performance of all time- but, I talk here about the character structure and it's affection to the movie and the franchise. Definitely BANE is more interesting.
My actors order as their performances.
Hardy - Bruce/batman - Hathawy - Oldman - Caine - JGL

Music - 10/10
There's nothing to say here. Hans Zimmer is a GOD.

Production Design - 9.5/10
Just there was a little flaws like shown public streets names on badges sometimes for a second or something. That was the only thing.

Production - 10/10
just WOW!! What a production. not talking about the money but the substance!! Amazingly professional people! One of the best ever if not the best!!!!!

.. I could go for weeks later discussing that movie and its awesomeness. but, I really don't like writing a long-reviews or something.
Posts: 204
DKnight007 wrote:Hmm....it would have been interesting if WB's and Nolan decided to release TDKRises in two parts like how last Potter was done.

I think that would have been interesting to say the least. I'm surprised WB's didn't try for that to "milk the cash cow" so to speak.

Nolan probably didn't want to that though.


i'm glad nolan didn't go for that. i hate how studios split these stories for mainly money. they've been doing it a lot for these teen/young adult book adaptations. plus, for this trilogy, i don't find it necessary and i would've hated waiting another year or months for something that could've been shown all at once.

yet, i do agree that this film felt the shortest out the three even though the time length was the longest. that surprised me by the end of the film. it's funny how people raised their eye brows about that when the time length was announced. guess not anymore. with dark knight, i felt the length after the hospital sequence (after seeing the film more than once).

yes, i do think for certain scenes more could've been shown and that would've filled out the story more. once bruce was gone from gotham, i felt like the pacing just took off and the film really didn't get a chance to breathe or take a break where the audience could just take in what was going on. that's probably what bothered me most about the film. it's so fast paced that it's not surprising that you have to watch it more than once to really understand the details. beyond some of it's problematic areas, it's still a great entry and wraps up bruce's story well.
Posts: 28
Location: Dubai, U.A.E
Watched TDKR for the first time on August 17th. To date, I've watched it thrice, and do plan on watching it a couple more times.

I absolutely love-love-love the ending! As a Batman fan, I’m glad that Nolan ended his trilogy on a high. Bale gives us his best Bruce/Batman performance. The story was fantastic and has so many layers to it. On IMAX, the movie looks stunning! The fight scenes were choreographed well, especially the first fight between Batman and Bane.

Score: 8.5/10
Posts: 1416
Location: Italy
I've finally seen it! :-D

First of all, as many of you have already said, one viewing isn't enough for this film. Personally, I never got the impression that the film was "overcrowded" in terms of either characters or subplots, but there's surely much to chew on. This movie has a Dickensian feel to it - not only because of the many callbacks and parallels to "A Tale of Two Cities" but also in its approach to storytelling itself. It's a 2:45 hour Dickens novel, with lots of characters, themes and subplots that start intertwining almost under the surface until all the pieces fall into place in the finale.

And while I'm definitely not a technical expert, personally I wasn't bothered by the editing in the slightest (except maybe in a couple of minor occasions). While it's a bit "brusque", I think it served the story well. While TDK was kindof a Shakesperean play, with events taking place in a short time frame, which allowed for a tight narration, and a clear, almost theatrical structure, TDKR again has a novel-like quality, with weeks and sometimes months passing between one scene and the next, and it requires some more time and effort to "adjust" to.

As for the characters, I'll say more in their respective threads, but I can say I'm very satisfied with the "new entries". I knew I'd like Blake since I first saw him in the trailers, but man, Selina. She'd grown on me with each new trailer, too, but I'd never, ever expected I'd like her so much. Excellent performance by Anne Hathaway, and excellent portrayal of the character. She had me at her first scene, and I ended up genuinely caring about her and rooting for her. As for Bane, he had some very powerful scenes and Hardy did a wonderful job with his eyes and body language, but I think he was heavily penalized by the dubbing. He's one of the main reasons why I want to rewatch the film in English.
I loved Bruce in this film. Such a wonderful character arc brought to a great conclusion. It was totally not the conclusion I was expecting before seeing the film, but I found it to be incredibly rewarding, and it made perfect sense in the context of the story Nolan told. I won't say any more about Bruce and Alfred here, though, because I'd end up writing a thread-derailing essay :lol: .

Something that I really wasn't expecting but I appreciated a lot was the legend-like feel of the
prison
and the stories/scenes connected to it. It's something straight out of an old epic, and I feel like it helped give a "mythical" connotation to the film. The chant scenes are incredible. Shivers down my spine.
As for the rest of the score, I can't say I didn't miss JNH's sweeping themes, but I think Zimmer did a good job (the finale is wonderful, and the "quieter" themes at the beginning were also beautiful), but maybe the thing I appreciated the most was the silence
during Batman and Bane's first confrontation. It gave the scene such a raw, brutal feel.


The Wall Street scene just comments itself.

I can't give the film a rating yet, maybe because it caught me so unprepared on many fronts. I walked into the cinema expecting a film with the convoluted narrative structure of Begins, and the explicitly philosophical dialogue of TDK. I did get an intricated narration and some good food for thought, but this film takes its own approach to it all and goes its own direction. All I know is, I'm enjoying thinking and writing about it and I want to see it again (preferably after rewatching BB and TDK), and this is always a good sign. :-D
Posts: 5059
Location: The Discount Inn
I was disappointed
Posts: 741
I wasn't. :ninja:
Posts: 9460
Location: The Ashes of Gotham
dafox wrote:I was disappointed

Posts: 741
:clap: :lol:
← Previous page Next page →
← Return to The Dark Knight Rises
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: Exabot [Bot] and 5 guests.