RT Guesses ?
Posted: July 15th, 2012, 6:14 pm
Yeah Stephanie Z is a mega cunt.EctoCooler31 wrote:"You forgot David Denby and Rex Reed."
And Stephanie Z!
Is Armond White still part of RT?
Discussion forums for the premiere fan community for and by fans of film director Christopher Nolan.
http://www.nolanfans.com/forums/
Yeah Stephanie Z is a mega cunt.EctoCooler31 wrote:"You forgot David Denby and Rex Reed."
And Stephanie Z!
Is Armond White still part of RT?
He got fired for giving Jack and Jill a 4 star review.EctoCooler31 wrote:"You forgot David Denby and Rex Reed."
And Stephanie Z!
Is Armond White still part of RT?
Metacritic is dumb.LateReg wrote:Guessing Rotten Tomatoes isn't all that difficult. As most are saying, this will most likely score in the 90s.
Guessing Metacritic, however, is a whole other ballgame, not so black and white...
I've always far preferred it to Rotten Tomatoes. Less jackassery to deal with, and all "elite" critics. Metacritic seems to me a much truer score, if not as all encompassing of the world wide web...which is a good thing.DesertTurtle wrote:Metacritic is dumb.LateReg wrote:Guessing Rotten Tomatoes isn't all that difficult. As most are saying, this will most likely score in the 90s.
Guessing Metacritic, however, is a whole other ballgame, not so black and white...
Because of their chosen critics having that bias? I can see that.ComptonTerry wrote:I think Metacritic is pretty genre biased.
True but the reason why it's more difficult is many of the "top critics" have biases and agendas that go above simply looking at the movie and objectively writing a review of it.LateReg wrote:Guessing Rotten Tomatoes isn't all that difficult. As most are saying, this will most likely score in the 90s.
Guessing Metacritic, however, is a whole other ballgame, not so black and white...
Good point. The only thing I can say though is that I think some of the so called critics on RT have far more annoying biases than any longstanding critic from a major publication. For example, comic book movies always get a push from the fanboys, horror films get higher scores from a horror website, etc., and there are a lot of those types of reviewers on RT.TeddieM wrote:True but the reason why it's more difficult is many of the "top critics" have biases and agendas that go above simply looking at the movie and objectively writing a review of it.LateReg wrote:Guessing Rotten Tomatoes isn't all that difficult. As most are saying, this will most likely score in the 90s.
Guessing Metacritic, however, is a whole other ballgame, not so black and white...
For what it's worth Dark Knight got an 82, Batman Begins 70 on Metacritic - Avengers only got a 69.
MRQE is actually probably a better overall gauge then both RT and Metacritic but RT is the most widely viewed so. On that DK got an 89 and Begins and 81.