you guys should actually read this stuff, it's enragingly hilarious
he starts off with the otherwise legit complaint about exposition and wanders off calling Nolan annoyingly literal, an explosion-whore or basically - a chimpanzee bending over a typewriter
I just wonder how someone who knows so much about movies fail so much.
prince0gotham wrote:you guys should actually read this stuff, it's enragingly hilarious
he starts off with the otherwise legit complaint about exposition and wanders off calling Nolan annoyingly literal, an explosion-whore or basically - a chimpanzee bending over a typewriter
I just wonder how someone who knows so much about movies fail so much.
What an insane article. Some things are note worthy and are noticeable flaws (of which won't annoy/bother everyone), but he comes across as another hater, injecting his time in an article such as this.
most of the 'note-worthy' things (which I noticed too) are completely out of context and instead of mentioned in a 'this is a problem i have with it' tone, they're SCREAMING in a way saying Inception is the lowest form of art
which makes even those 'note-worthy' points lose any kind of weight
prince0gotham wrote:most of the 'note-worthy' things (which I noticed too) are completely out of context and instead of mentioned in a 'this is a problem i have with it' tone, they're SCREAMING in a way saying Inception is the lowest form of art
which makes even those 'note-worthy' points lose any kind of weight