For Those Who Have Questions

This 2010 contemporary sci-fi actioner follows a subconscious security team around the globe and into the intimate and infinite world of dreams.
Posts: 52
Joined: July 2010
Anita18 wrote:One question I can't really find a good answer for is how Fischer is able to wake up in level 3 and carry on like he no longer has two bullets in his body. :lol: Eames is a very good forger so I guess that he was able to remove them without Fischer remembering but....anyone else have an explanation? :lol: Yusuf was probably not as experienced a dreamer as Eames which is why they could not have done the same to Saito in level 1.
Yeah, I don't know. In real life, you definitely can't just defibrillate someone who's been shot and expect it to work, so... I don't have any clue. I chalk this one up to it being a movie, like the projections being such bad shots. In movies, defibrillators always work and the bad guys never know how to fire a gun. That's just how it is.
moonwalkerwiz wrote:Thanks to everyone. These posts are really clearing things up. But here's my question: How can the shared experience device work in a dream when it doesn't have any real properties? And if it DOES have real properties in a dream, who thinks of these properties (thus, who thinks of the device in a dream? Who creates the device in a dream?)

And, since it's just a made-up dream device in a dream, what if someone didn't believe it is real? Would that hinder the device from working?


I imagine that anyone can bring the device into the dream. Like guns and totems, the device is an object, and everyone within the dream seems to be able to dream up objects ("You mustn't be afraid to dream a little bigger, darling."). However, I can't understand why the team members didn't use this ability more often.

One reason may be that, although participants in the dream can bring anything they want INTO the dream (like totems, clothes, guns, etc.), they are unable to change the dream on the fly. That particular ability is reserved for the dreamer. In addition, it seems that all of the objects within the dream must be "routed" through the dreamer in some way, as if the subconscious of a dream participant requests an object and the dreamer is left to recreate that object. Certainly, this would make sense, given the ability of totems to behave the way they do.

As for the properties of the suitcase device, I don't really know why they can't modify them within the dream. Maybe there's some sort of restriction on the ways that people can manipulate shared dreams within the shared dreams? But I don't know. I can't think up a good explanation for this one. It's just one of those things, like the defibrillator above, that requires suspension of disbelief.
theweatherman wrote:
moonwalkerwiz wrote:Thanks for clarifying that. Here's another question:

How does the totem actually work? For example, Cobb's totem spins infinitely when he's in a dream world. Is that an inherent property of the totem? Or does Cobb command it to spin indefinitely? (If he can command it, then does that mean he can command anything in the dream world to do as he wishes?) If your totem is a chess piece, like Ariadne's, how can such a totem tip you off on the nature of the world you're in? It doesn't really spin like Cobb's. I mean, how is a totem different from any item with you or piece of clothing that you wear in a dream world?
This question is rather weighted and is oft debated already on these forums. I believe that there is something special about Cobb's totem that spins non-stop in any dream no matter what and will spin normally in the real world.

However the rest of the totems just have to be something that is personal enough that if it was recreated by someone else in a dream, they would recognize it as a fake. It would be similar to when Saito recognized that the carpet wasn't his own.
I agree with this analysis. While typical totems are supposed to differentiate between your own dreams and others' dreams, Dom's totem is implied to be different; his behaves differently, depending on whether it's in a dream or reality.

Here's how a typical totem works: You have an object that only you know intimately. In your own dreams, you can create that object just fine. However, if you're in a dream that someone else has designed, they'll attempt to recreate that object (like Saito's carpet), and miss little nuances. This way, you can tell whether you're in your own dream/reality or a shared dream. In shared dreams (except for those in which you're the dreamer), your totem will behave in wonky ways.
donthemen wrote:My question is, how did Arthur not wake up from L2 (hotel) when the van hit the guard rail in L1 (rainy LA), which was supposed to be the kick for everyone?

I understand everyone else missing it since they were in L3 (snow fortress), but Arthur seemed immune to it somehow (we do see him fly through the hallway upon impact, though).
I've addressed this previously, but I believe that kicks can be resisted. This is just my take on it, but I believe that's why Arthur resisted the van's kick in level 2 and why Dom was able to resist the collapsing building's kick in level 4.

LPM
Posts: 1
Joined: July 2010
I have a couple of questions after watching the film for the second time.

If the weightlessness during Arthur's hotel dream is caused by the free-falling van on level 1, why are inanimate objects(telephone, hotel cart, etc.) and other characters that are not in the van also in a state of weightlessness? Also, the weightlessness doesn't seem to apply to everything, including the elevator itself, why are some objects affected by the weightlessness while others are not?

Posts: 52
Joined: July 2010
LPM wrote:I have a couple of questions after watching the film for the second time.

If the weightlessness during Arthur's hotel dream is caused by the free-falling van on level 1, why are inanimate objects(telephone, hotel cart, etc.) and other characters that are not in the van also in a state of weightlessness? Also, the weightlessness doesn't seem to apply to everything, including the elevator itself, why are some objects affected by the weightlessness while others are not?
The weightlessness appears to affect everything, including the elevator; remember that the elevator continued to float in the middle of the shaft, even after Arthur snapped the cables. Because the dreamer is the one who creates the dream world, his state in the previous level carries through to the level below. So, because Arthur (the dreamer for level 2) was in a state of free-fall in the van, everything is weightless in level 2.

User avatar
Posts: 3197
Joined: April 2010
Location: We can't stop here, this is Bat Country!
Dude I just wanted to congratulate you for doing all this work, I've only seen it once and I'm gonna have my second viewing today, just wanted to say how impressive is that you actually figured out the chronology like you did.
I would think that you disagree with the illustrated guide for the levels posted I don't know where that said there was 5 levels of reality a couple of days ago.
Image
I say that because of your take on Limbo, what do you think bro, how would you do the illustrated guide better?
that considering of course that it's uncertain if the so called "level1" should actually be called a level if it's absolute reality or if it is indeed a level (of dreaming)

User avatar
Posts: 1424
Joined: January 2009
Location: Cupertino, CA
Anita18 wrote:Cobb and Ariadne weren't in limbo, they were just down another level with Fischer because they got all three hooked up to the machine while Fischer was dying in level 3.
The script says they went to limbo...

Image

Posts: 3861
Joined: August 2009
Thanks to Alex I can say, "I told you so."

User avatar
Posts: 3197
Joined: April 2010
Location: We can't stop here, this is Bat Country!
:( , I want that book for Xmass.

Posts: 912
Joined: May 2010
OVERMAN wrote::( , I want that book for Xmass.
:lol: The first thought that came to my head was, "Ooh, they're using the Wells Fargo font. It's not Courier!" :lol: I'm such a design geek.

Post Reply