THANK YOU WALLY!!!!

Wally Pfister and Hoyte van Hoytema
Posts: 499
Joined: December 2010
Location: Limbo
Starting this thread for the sole sake of thanking Wally Pfister for refusing to shoot films in 3D or with digital cameras.

THANK YOU!!!
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:

Posts: 17390
Joined: June 2010
Location: The White City
MW715 wrote:Starting this thread for the sole sake of thanking Wally Pfister for refusing to shoot films in 3D or with digital cameras.

THANK YOU!!!
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:
What's wrong with digital cameras?

-Vader

MW715 wrote:Starting this thread for the sole sake of thanking Wally Pfister for refusing to shoot films in 3D or with digital cameras.

THANK YOU!!!
:clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap: :clap:





:think: I'll allow it.

Posts: 2278
Joined: February 2010
Location: Melbourne, Australia
digital has a lesser film look than film, so they add it in post, and they allow less in the frame

Posts: 4041
Joined: April 2010
....
Last edited by Jones on July 27th, 2011, 4:16 am, edited 1 time in total.

Posts: 17390
Joined: June 2010
Location: The White City
What about The Social Network? That's a digitally shot film, and it's absolutely gorgeous.

-Vader

Posts: 11403
Joined: August 2010
Location: Texas
I'm glad Wally doesn't shoot digital. But at the same time if he did I wouldn't mind. I'm sure it would look amazing. No 3D tho.. but if he did shoot in 3D I'm sure it would look amazing.

Posts: 499
Joined: December 2010
Location: Limbo
Vader182 wrote: What's wrong with digital cameras?

-Vader
I think digitally shot films look like crap. They either look like incredibly expensive home videos or BBC documentaries in my opinion. Sure film's expensive and a pain to work with, but it adds such atmosphere to the frame and looks so much better (in my opinion)

Posts: 17390
Joined: June 2010
Location: The White City
MW715 wrote:
Vader182 wrote: What's wrong with digital cameras?

-Vader
I think digitally shot films look like crap. They either look like incredibly expensive home videos or BBC documentaries in my opinion. Sure film's expensive and a pain to work with, but it adds such atmosphere to the frame and looks so much better (in my opinion)
You think The Social Network looks like incredibly expensive home videos or BBC documentaries?

Right.

-Vader

Posts: 499
Joined: December 2010
Location: Limbo
Vader182 wrote:
MW715 wrote: I think digitally shot films look like crap. They either look like incredibly expensive home videos or BBC documentaries in my opinion. Sure film's expensive and a pain to work with, but it adds such atmosphere to the frame and looks so much better (in my opinion)
You think The Social Network looks like incredibly expensive home videos or BBC documentaries?

Right.

-Vader
...I hated that movie... so don't get me started...

Post Reply