THANK YOU WALLY!!!!
Posted: July 27th, 2011, 9:47 pm
Wally is a hack... Deakins is much better.
Discussion forums for the premiere fan community for and by fans of film director Christopher Nolan.
http://www.nolanfans.com/forums/
That makes two of us. However, you must praise it for it's film making on a whole. It's digital image is pristine.MW715 wrote:...I hated that movie... so don't get me started...Vader182 wrote:
You think The Social Network looks like incredibly expensive home videos or BBC documentaries?
Right.
-Vader
Shitting on the social network is a very poor use of your 500th post.MW715 wrote: ...I hated that movie... so don't get me started...
Hated it or not, the cinematography is gorgeous, are you disagreeing?MW715 wrote:...I hated that movie... so don't get me started...Vader182 wrote:
You think The Social Network looks like incredibly expensive home videos or BBC documentaries?
Right.
-Vader
Cinematography isn't necessarily what I had a problem with. It was shot on digital cameras and I didn't like about it, but that doesn't affect whether or not they set up the shots well (which they did) But it still didn't make up for its other shortcomings.Vader182 wrote:Hated it or not, the cinematography is gorgeous, are you disagreeing?MW715 wrote: ...I hated that movie... so don't get me started...
-Vader
you aren't listening. The image itself is gorgeous in my opinion. Do you disagree?MW715 wrote:Cinematography isn't necessarily what I had a problem with. It was shot on digital cameras and I didn't like about it, but that doesn't affect whether or not they set up the shots well (which they did) But it still didn't make up for its other shortcomings.Vader182 wrote:
Hated it or not, the cinematography is gorgeous, are you disagreeing?
-Vader
I thought that it was the best I'd seen out of digital, yes I'd agree with that.Vader182 wrote:you aren't listening. The image itself is gorgeous in my opinion. Do you disagree?MW715 wrote: Cinematography isn't necessarily what I had a problem with. It was shot on digital cameras and I didn't like about it, but that doesn't affect whether or not they set up the shots well (which they did) But it still didn't make up for its other shortcomings.
-Vader
Then you haven't seen digital. Red One MX ain't the best man...MW715 wrote:I thought that it was the best I'd seen out of digital, yes I'd agree with that.Vader182 wrote:
you aren't listening. The image itself is gorgeous in my opinion. Do you disagree?
-Vader