Loading...
Wally Pfister and Hoyte van Hoytema

(Video) Pfister Q&A at UCLA

Posts: 3372
Location: Secret Canadian Bunker
Posts: 18333
Awesome stuff, thanks for the post!
Posts: 16485
Location: The White City
That was really fantastic. Usually learn at least a few things you hadn't before with each of these Wally interviews.
Posts: 2224
Shame Wally had that experience with the Phantom. Certainly seems to be basing most of his opinions on that experience, read another brief thing about him in Kodak mag. Tsk tsk. Get your hands on an ALEXA WALLY! Look what it did to Deakins!
Posts: 40064
RomanM wrote:Shame Wally had that experience with the Phantom. Certainly seems to be basing most of his opinions on that experience, read another brief thing about him in Kodak mag. Tsk tsk. Get your hands on an ALEXA WALLY! Look what it did to Deakins!


But Wally is better then Deakins.
Posts: 2224
allstarr55js wrote:
RomanM wrote:Shame Wally had that experience with the Phantom. Certainly seems to be basing most of his opinions on that experience, read another brief thing about him in Kodak mag. Tsk tsk. Get your hands on an ALEXA WALLY! Look what it did to Deakins!


But Wally is better then Deakins.


LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AHHHH!!! LMAOOO! Thanks for the laugh kiddo!
Posts: 13925
Location: La La Land
But Wally is better then Deakins.


First off, I disagree. Secondly, what the hell does that have to do with anything?

Get your hands on an ALEXA WALLY! Look what it did to Deakins!

:problem:

Why? For better low light or... why would you want him to use the ALEXA?
Posts: 2224
Crazy Eight wrote:
But Wally is better then Deakins.


First off, I disagree. Secondly, what the hell does that have to do with anything?

Get your hands on an ALEXA WALLY! Look what it did to Deakins!

:problem:

Why? For better low light or... why would you want him to use the ALEXA?


Because the Phantom is not the camera to use to judge digital cinematography against? LOL come on Crazy.
Posts: 40064
LMFAO!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

AHHHH!!! LMAOOO! Thanks for the laugh kiddo!


It is not that funny. Wally has this Deakins does not.
Image
First off, I disagree.


Of course you do.
Posts: 13925
Location: La La Land
It is not that funny. Wally has this Deakins does not.
Image


:facepalm:

When did you start sucking the Academy's dick? Deakin's had 9 nomination by the way, including two in the same year. He's been robbed so many times...

Because the Phantom is not the camera to use to judge digital cinematography against? LOL come on Crazy.


My bad. I thought you were suggesting he should replace his Anamorphic 35mm get up for the ALEXA.
Next page →
← Return to The Cinematographers
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest.